Cited by 709Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social DevelopmentOpen Source Software InnovationsInnovation, Technology, and Society

Participatory design and "democratizing innovation"

Björgvinsson, Erling, Ehn, Pelle, Hillgren, Per-Anders·2010·Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference

Abstract

Participatory design has become increasingly engaged in public spheres and everyday life and is no longer solely concerned with the workplace. This is not only a shift from work oriented productive activities to leisure and pleasurable engagements, but also a new milieu for production and innovation and entails a reorientation from "democracy at work" to "democratic innovation". What democratic innovation entails is currently defined by management and innovation research, which claims that innovation has been democratized through easy access to production tools and lead-users as the new experts driving innovation. We sketch an alternative "democratizing innovation" practice more in line with the original visions of participatory design based on our experience of running Malmö Living Labs - an open innovation milieu where new constellations, issues and ideas evolve from bottom-up long-term collaborations amongst diverse stakeholders. Two cases and controversial matters of concern are discussed. The fruitfulness of the concepts "Things" (as opposed to objects), "infrastructuring" (as opposed to projects) and "agonistic public spaces" (as opposed to consensual decision-making) are explored in relation to participatory innovation practices and democracy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1900441.1900448

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, the political interests in PD have been revitalized: there is an increasing interest in enabling and supporting PD in various everyday life contexts that are seen as complexly intermingled with power and political issues.

    “Recently, the political interests in PD have been revitalized: there is an increasing interest in enabling and supporting PD in various everyday life contexts that are seen as complexly intermingled with power and political issues (e.g., Björgvinsson et al., 2010; Le Dantec and DiSalvo, 2013; Simonsen and Robertson, 2013).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 29 · Cited by 709

Authors
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A.
Affiliations
Malmö University (SE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-11-29
Pages
41-50
OpenAlex
W1995072497
Cited by
709
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
FWCI
84.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Participatory Design Conference (publishedVersion)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
VINNOVA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Innovation, Technology, and Society
Keywords
participatory design, democratic innovation, open innovation, bottom-up collaboration, stakeholder collaboration, things, infrastructuring, lead users, public sphere

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review