The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User learning and performance with marking menus
Open accessAbstract
A marking menu is designed to allow a user to perform a menu selection by either popping-up a radial (or pie) menu, or by making a straight mark in the direction of the desired menu item without popping-up the menu.Previous evaluations in laboratory settings have shown the potential of marking menus.This paper reports on a case study of user behavior with marking menus in a real work situation.The study demonstrates the following: First, marking menus are used as designed.When users become expert with the menus, marks are used extensively.However, the transition to using marks is not one way.Expert users still switch back to menus to refresh their memory of menu layout.Second, marking is an extremely efficient interaction technique.Using a mark on average was 3.5 times faster than selection using the menu.Finally, design principles can be followed that make menu item/mark associations easier to learn, and interaction efficient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Snoddy, G. S. (1926) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0075814 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Shorthand writing on stylus keyboard
Zhai, S., & Kristensson, P.-O. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642630 · Cited by 371
(2007) · Cited by 192
Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces
Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Scarr, J., & Malacria, S. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2659796 · Cited by 193
Strategies for accelerating on-line learning of hotkeys
Grossman, T., Dragicevic, P., & Balakrishnan, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1240624.1240865 · Cited by 163
Reification, polymorphism and reuse: three principles for designing visual interfaces
Beaudouin-Lafon, M., & Mackay, W. E. (2000) · Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces · doi:10.1145/345513.345267 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurtenbach, G., & Buxton, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1994-04-24
- Pages
- 258-264
- OpenAlex
- W2067534690
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
