The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Real time groupware as a distributed system: concurrency control and its effect on the interface
Open accessAbstract
This paper exposes the concurrency control problem in groupware when it is implemented as a distributed system. Traditional concurrency control methods cannot be applied directly to groupware because system interactions include people as well as computers. Methods, such as locking, serialization, and their degree of optimism, are shown to have quite different impacts on the interface and how operations are displayed and perceived by group members. The paper considers both human and technical considerations that designers should ponder before choosing a particular concurrency control method. It also reviews our work-in-progress designing and implementing a library of concurrency schemes in GROUPKIT, a groupware toolkit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Concurrency control in groupware systems
Ellis, C. A., & Gibbs, S. J. (1989) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/66926.66963 · Cited by 873
Cited by
The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility
Ackerman, M. S. (2000) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_5 · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenberg, S., & Marwood, D.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1994 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '94
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1994
- Pages
- 207-217
- OpenAlex
- W1964641564
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
