The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments
Abstract
This paper presents a systematic literature review of the recent (2006--2010) development of automatic assessment tools for programming exercises. We discuss the major features that the tools support and the different approaches they are using both from the pedagogical and the technical point of view. Examples of these features are ways for the teacher to define tests, resubmission policies, security issues, and so forth. We have also identified a list of novel features, like assessing web software, that are likely to get more research attention in the future. As a conclusion, we state that too many new systems are developed, but also acknowledge the current reasons for the phenomenon. As one solution we encourage opening up the existing systems and joining efforts on developing those further. Selected systems from our survey are briefly described in Appendix A.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does
BIGGS, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (1999) · Cited by 3,374
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009 · Cited by 2,394
The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/s0169-2070(99)00018-7 · Cited by 1,789
A Survey of Automated Assessment Approaches for Programming Assignments
Ala-Mutka, K. M. (2005) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993400500150747 · Cited by 546
Tango: a framework and system for algorithm animation
Stasko, J. T. (1990) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.58216 · Cited by 506
Alice: a 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts
Cooper, S., Dann, W. P., & Pausch, R. F. (2000) · Journal of computing sciences in colleges · Cited by 489
Automatic test-based assessment of programming: A review
Douce, C., Livingstone, D., & Orwell, J. (2005) · Journal on Educational Resources in Computing · doi:10.1145/1163405.1163409 · Cited by 416
Karel the Robot: A Gentle Introduction to the Art of Programming
Pattis, R. E., Roberts, J., & Stehlik, M. (1994) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 353
The boss online submission and assessment system
Joy, M., Griffiths, N., & Boyatt, R. (2005) · Journal on Educational Resources in Computing · doi:10.1145/1163405.1163407 · Cited by 282
Web-CAT: automatically grading programming assignments
Edwards, S. H., & Perez-Quinones, M. A. (2008) · Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education · doi:10.1145/1384271.1384371 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Automatic Generation of Programming Exercises and Code Explanations Using Large Language Models
Sarsa, S., Denny, P., Hellas, A., & Leinonen, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/3501385.3543957 · Cited by 497
Introductory programming: a systematic literature review
Luxton-Reilly, A., Simon, Albluwi, I., Becker, B. A., Giannakos, M., Kumar, A. N., Ott, L., Paterson, J., Scott, M. J., Sheard, J., et al. (2018) · Proceedings Companion of the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3293881.3295779 · Cited by 485
Automatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review
Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027 · Cited by 440
A systematic literature review of automated feedback generation for programming exercises
Keuning, H., Jeuring, J., & Heeren, B. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3231711 · Cited by 370
Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review
Messer, M., Brown, N. C. C., Kölling, M., & Shi, M. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3636515 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Ihantola, P., Ahoniemi, T., Karavirta, V., & Seppälä, O.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2010-10-28
- Pages
- 86-93
- OpenAlex
- W2151828850
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 14.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1930464.1930480
- The paper
- Ihantola, P., Ahoniemi, T., Karavirta, V., & Seppälä, O. (2010). Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments. Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1145/1930464.1930480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.