Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 982

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks

Backstrom, Lars, Leskovec, Jure·2011·Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining

Abstract

Predicting the occurrence of links is a fundamental problem in networks. In the link prediction problem we are given a snapshot of a network and would like to infer which interactions among existing members are likely to occur in the near future or which existing interactions are we missing. Although this problem has been extensively studied, the challenge of how to effectively combine the information from the network structure with rich node and edge attribute data remains largely open.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1935826.1935914

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 982

Metadata

Authors
Backstrom, L., & Leskovec, J.
Venue
Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-02-09
Pages
635-644
OpenAlex
W2107569009
Cited by
982
References
29
FWCI
74.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1935826.1935914
The paper
Backstrom, L., & Leskovec, J. (2011). Supervised random walks: predicting and recommending links in social networks. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935914

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.