The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Usable gestures for blind people: understanding preference and performance
Abstract
Despite growing awareness of the accessibility issues surrounding touch screen use by blind people, designers still face challenges when creating accessible touch screen interfaces. One major stumbling block is a lack of understanding about how blind people actually use touch screens. We conducted two user studies that compared how blind people and sighted people use touch screen gestures. First, we conducted a gesture elicitation study in which 10 blind and 10 sighted people invented gestures to perform common computing tasks on a tablet PC. We found that blind people have different gesture preferences than sighted people, including preferences for edge-based gestures and gestures that involve tapping virtual keys on a keyboard. Second, we conducted a performance study in which the same participants performed a set of reference gestures. We found significant differences in the speed, size, and shape of gestures performed by blind people versus those performed by sighted people. Our results suggest new design guidelines for accessible touch screen interfaces.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“research confirms that blind users are able to draw and make gestures on touchscreens [9]”
From Designing a text entry multimodal keypad for blind users of touchscreen mobile phones (2014) · cites this paper as [9]
Citations
Cites
User-defined gestures for surface computing
Wobbrock, J. O., Morris, M. R., & Wilson, A. D. (2009) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518866 · Cited by 1,339
Self-citationActivation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M.-P., Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380526a0 · Cited by 1,253
Baudel, T., & Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/159544.159562 · Cited by 474
Tactile Acuity is Enhanced in Blindness
Goldreich, D., & Kanics, I. M. (2003) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-08-03439.2003 · Cited by 442
Tactile spatial resolution in blind Braille readers
Boven, R. W. V., Hamilton, R. H., Kauffman, T., Keenan, J. P., & Pascual–Leone, A. (2000) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.54.12.2230 · Cited by 380
Kane, S. K., Bigham, J. P., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2008) · Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/1414471.1414487 · Cited by 374
Self-citationShorthand writing on stylus keyboard
Zhai, S., & Kristensson, P.-O. (2003) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/642611.642630 · Cited by 371
Back-of-device interaction allows creating very small touch devices
Baudisch, P., & Chu, G. (2009) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518995 · Cited by 306
Issues and techniques in touch-sensitive tablet input
Buxton, W. J., Hill, R. D., & Rowley, P. (1985) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/325165.325239 · Cited by 233
Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall-size displays
Guimbretière, F. V., Stone, M., & Winograd, T. (2001) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/502352.502353 · Cited by 225
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.5555/1839214.1839258 · DOI
- Crew , S. Touch-screen gadgets alienate blind . Reuters , January 8, 2009 . Crew, S. Touch-screen gadgets alienate blind. Reuters, January 8, 2009.
- Landau , S. and Wells , L . Merging tactile sensory input and audio data by means of the Talking Tactile Tablet . Proc. Eurohaptics '03 , ( 2003 ), 414--418. Landau, S. and Wells, L. Merging tactile sensory input and audio data by means of the Talking Tactile Tablet. Proc. Eurohaptics '03, (2003), 414--418.
- 10.5555/1143079.1143084 · DOI
- 10.5555/1839214.1839260 · DOI
- 10.5555/1783789.1783817 · DOI
- 10.5555/1783789.1783818 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dell, N. L., Vaidyanathan, V., Medhi, I., Cutrell, E. B., & Thies, W. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208589 · Cited by 286
“people interact with computer systems [15]; researchers in child-computer interaction explore how computer systems are used by children, particularly in the context of education [24]; cross-cultural HCI looks at what happens when designers and users come from different cultural backgrounds [12] and the relatively new…”
BackgroundInteractivity improves usability of geographic maps for visually impaired people
Brock, A. M., Truillet, P., Oriola, B., Picard, D., & Jouffrais, C. (2015) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2014.924412 · Cited by 195
“Kane, Wobbrock, and Ladner (2011) identified double taps as gestures that are usable by blind people.”
BackgroundMennicken, S., & Huang, E. M. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31205-2_10 · Cited by 174
Khan, A., & Khusro, S. (2021) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00733-8 · Cited by 177
“Moreover, sighted people consume 66% of their time in editing and correcting text on an automatic speech recognizer output on the desktop system [178].”
BackgroundVatavu, R.-D., Cramariuc, G., & Schipor, D. M. (2014) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.10.007 · Cited by 171
“Kane et al. (2011) found that blind people prefer gesture articulations that take place at the edges of the touch-screen, and that their articulations are different in speed, size, and geometric shape when compared to the same gestures articulated by sighted people.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Kane, S. K., Wobbrock, J. O., & Ladner, R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-05-07
- Pages
- 413-422
- OpenAlex
- W2136691781
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 45.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- blind users, touch screen interface, touch gestures, accessibility, gesture elicitation, gesture performance, virtual keyboard, design guidelines, tablet computers, user study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
