The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Starcraft from the stands: understanding the game spectator
Abstract
Video games are primarily designed for the players. However, video game spectating is also a popular activity, boosted by the rise of online video sites and major gaming tournaments. In this paper, we focus on the spectator, who is emerging as an important stakeholder in video games. Our study focuses on Starcraft, a popular real-time strategy game with millions of spectators and high level tournament play. We have collected over a hundred stories of the Starcraft spectator from online sources, aiming for as diverse a group as possible. We make three contributions using this data: i) we find nine personas in the data that tell us who the spectators are and why they spectate; ii) we strive to understand how different stakeholders, like commentators, players, crowds, and game designers, affect the spectator experience; and iii) we infer from the spectators' expressions what makes the game entertaining to watch, forming a theory of distinct types of information asymmetry that create suspense for the spectator. One design implication derived from these findings is that, rather than presenting as much information to the spectator as possible, it is more important for the stakeholders to be able to decide how and when they uncover that information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The MSSC had been used as a base for a qualitative study into the spectator motivations of esports.
“Prior to the undertaking of quantitatively measuring esports spectating motivations with the use of the MSSC, the instrument had been used as a base for a qualitative study into the spectator motivations of esports (Cheung and Huang, 2011).”
From Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch (2018) · cites this paper as Cheung and Huang, 2011
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb00482.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1977.tb02141.x · DOI
- 10.1145/1453152.1453156 · DOI
- Ddengster . 2010 . Spectator moments in Starcraft . Team Liquid Forums. Retrieved September 14, 2010 from http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145848. Ddengster. 2010. Spectator moments in Starcraft. Team Liquid Forums. Retrieved September 14, 2010 from http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=145848.
- 10.1145/1124772.1124834 · DOI
- 10.1145/1124772.1124955 · DOI
- Giles , J. 2007 . Virtual entrepreneurs and 'griefers' spoil the fantasy of online worlds . New Scientist , September 2007 , 28 -- 29 . Giles, J. 2007. Virtual entrepreneurs and 'griefers' spoil the fantasy of online worlds. New Scientist, September 2007, 28--29. · DOI
- Goffman , E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everday Life . Anchor Books , Doubleday . Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everday Life. Anchor Books, Doubleday.
- 10.1177/1555412007309525 · DOI
- Huizinga J. 1938. Homo Ludens. Beacon Press. Huizinga J. 1938. Homo Ludens. Beacon Press.
- Lincoln Y. S. and Guba E. G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Newbury Park CA. Lincoln Y. S. and Guba E. G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Newbury Park CA. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1123/jsm.7.1.44 · DOI
- Nardi , B. 2010. My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft . University of Michigan Press. Nardi, B. 2010. My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. University of Michigan Press.
- 10.1145/1054972.1055074 · DOI
- 10.5555/1215723 · DOI
- Shea , C. 2008 . Blizzard Entertainment's Frank Pearse: AU Interview . Australia , August 3, 2008. Retrieved September 23, 2010 from http://pc.ign.com/articles/896/896078p1.html. Shea, C. 2008. Blizzard Entertainment's Frank Pearse: AU Interview. Australia, August 3, 2008. Retrieved September 23, 2010 from http://pc.ign.com/articles/896/896078p1.html.
- 10.1145/1718918.1718981 · DOI
- Sutton-Smith , B. 2001. The Ambiguity of Play . Harvard University Press . Sutton-Smith, B. 2001. The Ambiguity of Play. Harvard University Press.
- The Storyteller . 2009 . Tension in SC . Team Liquid Forums. Retrieved July 25, 2010 from http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=87117. The Storyteller. 2009. Tension in SC. Team Liquid Forums. Retrieved July 25, 2010 from http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=87117.
- Trail , G. T. , Fink , J. S. , and Anderson , D. F. 2003 . Sport spectator consumption behavior . Sport Marketing Quarterly , 12 ( 1 ), 8 -- 17 . Trail, G. T., Fink, J. S., and Anderson, D. F. 2003. Sport spectator consumption behavior. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(1), 8--17.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: an IT affordance perspective.
Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100886 · Cited by 1,038
Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch
Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.013 · Cited by 870
How Live Streaming Changes Shopping Decisions in E-commerce: A Study of Live Streaming Commerce
Wang, Y., Lu, Z., Cao, P., Chu, J., Wang, H., & Wattenhofer, R. (2022) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-022-09439-2 · Cited by 179
TwitchChat: A Dataset for Exploring Livestream Chat
Ringer, C., Nicolaou, M., & Walker, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment · doi:10.1609/aiide.v16i1.7439 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheung, G., & Huang, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- ORCID
- Huang, Jeff
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-05-07
- Pages
- 763-772
- OpenAlex
- W2160765669
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 21.86
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Keywords
- StarCraft, real-time strategy games, spectators, audience experience, commentators, game design, information asymmetry, suspense, online gaming communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review