Cited by 112Child Development and Digital TechnologyTechnology Use by Older AdultsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Hello, is grandma there? let's read! StoryVisit: family video chat and connected e-books

Raffle, Hayes, Revelle, Glenda, Mori, Koichi, Ballagas, Rafael, Buza, Kyle, Horii, Hiroshi, Kaye, Joseph, Cook, Kristin +3 more·2011·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

StoryVisit allows children and long-distance adults to experience a sense of togetherness by reading children's story books together over a distance. StoryVisit combines video conferencing and connected books: remote grown-up and child readers can see and hear each other, and can also see and control the same e-book. We report on research with 61 families - over 200 users including parents, children and long-distance readers - who used StoryVisit in their homes with a long-distance reader for at least one reading session. In addition, we report qualitative findings regarding nineteen of the families who participated in telephone interviews and four families who were monitored and interviewed by researchers at home. Results show that connected e-book video chat sessions last about five times as long as the typical video chats reported in previous research on families with young children. Moreover, the addition of an animated character increased session lengths by another 50%. StoryVisit usage peaked for families with three year olds, showing that sustained distance interactions with very young children are possible if communication technologies incorporate joint activities that engage children and adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1978942.1979121

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Midjourney was selected as a research probe due to its customization and easy-to-use features and its speed and efficiency in generating diverse high-quality images without prolonged prompt setup.

    “In addition to physical expressive materials, we introduced one of the most popular image-generative AI tools, Midjourney [74], as a research probe due to several advantages: (1) customization and easy-to-use: it provides a broad range of customization features and a highly user-friendly interface [88]. (2) speed and efficiency: it quickly generates diverse high-quality images without prolonged p”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 112

Authors
Raffle, H., Revelle, G., Mori, K., Ballagas, R., Buza, K., Horii, H., Kaye, J., Cook, K., Freed, N., Go, J., & Spasojevic, M.
Affiliations
  • Nokia Research Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
  • University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
  • Sesame Workshop (US)
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-05-07
Pages
1195-1204
OpenAlex
W2109520718
Cited by
112
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
91.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
videoconferencing, family communication, grandparents, children's storybooks, animated characters, very young children, telepresence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review