Cited by 36Algorithms and Data CompressionGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysis

WHAM: a high-throughput sequence alignment method

Li, Yinan, Terrell, Allison, Patel, Jignesh M.·2011·Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data

Abstract

Over the last decade the cost of producing genomic sequences has dropped dramatically due to the current so called "next-gen" sequencing methods. However, these next-gen sequencing methods are critically dependent on fast and sophisticated data processing methods for aligning a set of query sequences to a reference genome using rich string matching models. The focus of this work is on the design, development and evaluation of a data processing system for this crucial "short read alignment" problem. Our system, called WHAM, employs novel hash-based indexing methods and bitwise operations for sequence alignments. It allows richer match models than existing methods and it is significantly faster than the existing state-of-the-art method. In addition, its relative speedup over the existing method is poised to increase in the future in which read sequence lengths will increase. The WHAM code is available at http://www.cs.wisc.edu/wham/.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1989323.1989370

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High inter-site false positive DEG rates were observed across multiple analysis pipelines (WHAM, Mapsplice, Novoalign, Cufflinks, HTSeq), independent of pipeline or alignment method.

    “When we examined the inter-site DEG false positive rates for several other analysis pipelines (WHAM34, Mapsplice35, Novoalign36, Cufflinks23, 37, 38 and HTSeq39) we found similarly high false positive rates, regardless of the analysis pipeline or read alignment methods used (Supplementary Fig. 1).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Terrell, A., & Patel, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of data
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-06-12
Pages
445-456
ISSN
0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2112099725
Cited by
36
References
22
Citations by year
2021: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.76
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
short-read alignment, next-generation sequencing, hash-based indexing, bitwise operations, sequence alignment, string matching, reference genome, WHAM

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review