GIS analysis of U.S. patent data: examining local innovation patterns
Abstract
Current patent data in the United States provides limited spatial analysis capabilities within GIS applications. Most U.S. government data sources assign Federal Information Processing System (FIPS) codes or postal zip codes which facilitate GIS data input. However, neither the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office nor the National Bureau of Economic Research assign location codes, or geocodes, in patent records or patent applicant data. Instead, patent records contain postal town or city place-names provided along with U.S. state locations. Place-names may not be unique within certain states and data from large cities can only be attributed over a wide area. This has resulted in most patent research to be analyzed only at the state scale of analysis. This paper presents a method for data structures and geocoding that allows for geographical analysis of patents at the local (town, city and/or county) scale. This method is applied for data in Ohio from 2002 to 2006---the five most recent years of available data. The results show significant variability of data at the local scale. This variability is shown in terms of total patents, patenting by economic sector and for patent data standardized for the per capita labor force. The results also show the predominance of general manufacturing patents across the state, by comparison to specialized sectors. The results also illustrate two distinct innovation regions, along the I-75 corridor and in Northeast Ohio.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A patent of innovations is a measurement of output from innovation activity and an indicator of company technological strengths.
“In addition, a patent of innovations is a measurement of output from innovation activity and an indicator of company technological strengths [5, 6].”
From Global Perspective on Payroll System Patent and Research: A Bibliometric Performance (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global Perspective on Payroll System Patent and Research: A Bibliometric Performance
(2019) · International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering · doi:10.35940/ijrte.b1028.0782s219 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Moore, J., & Cui, Q.
- Affiliations
- University of Akron (US)
- ORCID
- Cui, Qian
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing for Geospatial Research & Applications - COM.Geo '11
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W1973824346
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference and Exhibition on Computing for Geospatial Research & Application (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geographic Information Systems Studies
- Keywords
- patent information, geocoding, innovation regions, Northeast Ohio, Ohio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review