The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Abstract
It is my great honor and pleasure to welcome you to ACM SIGKDD's 17th Annual Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD2011, being held in San Diego, California, from August 21 through August 24, 2011. This year's KDD Conference continues its tradition of being the premier forum for the sharing of leading edge research results and industrial experiences of KDD theory, technology, and applications, among it's multi-disciplinary participants from academia, government, and industry. The KDD2011 organization committee has worked hard to help organize this year's conference, and to ensure that it maintains its pre-eminent position as the top worldwide conference for dissemination of cutting edge technical progress of this community. The science and business of extracting actionable insights from data has never been more important. We are experiencing an explosion of data, and the consequent interest in analyzing this information in a timely and rigorous fashion. Data and content volumes are expected to grow exponentially in the next decade. Much of the new growth is expected to dominantly come from unstructured content; documents, images, audio and video. These trends are setting up the stage for a fascinating set of new research challenges, and simultaneously driving the need for accelerated deployment of our research advances, ranging from algorithmic advances in core modeling and learning techniques, to scalable methods for parallel and distributed mining of massive scale data, to new paradigms for consumption and delivery of the analytic insights. It is my hope that attendees at this conference will be able to sense and appreciate the impressive progress our community is making in addressing these challenges. We have made a few changes this year to the traditional KDD conference format, to address the growing interest in this technology. The conference will begin as always with workshops and tutorials on Sunday, and then we have a full 3-day program for the main body of the conference. The extended 3-day main program has allowed us to include additional keynote plenary talks and make space for some exciting new content. We are launching a new track this year, called the Industry Practice Expo. The aim of the IPE track is to bring in eminent practitioners of KDD from industry to share with the participants their in depth experiences on what it means to successfully deploy working instances of high impacting KDD solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
Multi-view learning overview: Recent progress and new challenges
Zhao, J., Xie, X., Xu, X., & Sun, S. (2017) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2017.02.007 · Cited by 1,002
Loh, H. W., Ooi, C. P., Seoni, S., Barua, P. D., Molinari, F., & Acharya, U. R. (2022) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107161 · Cited by 734
Notions of explainability and evaluation approaches for explainable artificial intelligence
Vilone, G., & Longo, L. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.009 · Cited by 598
Privacy preservation in federated learning: An insightful survey from the GDPR perspective
Truong, N., Sun, K., Wang, S., Guitton, F., & Guo, Y. (2021) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2021.102402 · Cited by 399
Anomaly detection via a Gaussian Mixture Model for flight operation and safety monitoring
Li, L., Hansman, R. J., Palacios, R., & Welsch, R. (2016) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.007 · Cited by 254
Mapping the customer journey: Lessons learned from graph-based online attribution modeling
Anderl, E., Becker, I., von Wangenheim, F., & Schumann, J. H. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.03.001 · Cited by 186
Algorithmic fairness in computational medicine
Xu, J., Xiao, Y., Wang, W. H., Ning, Y., Shenkman, E. A., Bian, J., & Wang, F. (2022) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104250 · Cited by 170
Himeur, Y., Sohail, S. S., Bensaali, F., Amira, A., & Alazab, M. (2022) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2022.102746 · Cited by 139
Wang, F., Zhang, Z., Zhang, X., Wu, Z., Mo, T., Lu, Q., Wang, W., Li, R., Xu, J., Tang, X., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3768165 · Cited by 106
FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers
Yu, Z., & Menzies, T. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.021 · Cited by 80
Olorisade, B. K., Brereton, P., & Andras, P. (2017) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.07.010 · Cited by 54
Assessing expert system-assisted literature reviews with a case study
Yu, Z., Carver, J. C., Rothermel, G., & Menzies, T. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116958 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-08-21
- OpenAlex
- W4250331344
- Cited by
- 789
- References
- 0
- Type
- paratext
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.