The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling
Abstract
Since 2005, processor designers have increased core counts to exploit Moore's Law scaling, rather than focusing on single-core performance. The failure of Dennard scaling, to which the shift to multicore parts is partially a response, may soon limit multicore scaling just as single-core scaling has been curtailed. This paper models multicore scaling limits by combining device scaling, single-core scaling, and multicore scaling to measure the speedup potential for a set of parallel workloads for the next five technology generations. For device scaling, we use both the ITRS projections and a set of more conservative device scaling parameters. To model single-core scaling, we combine measurements from over 150 processors to derive Pareto-optimal frontiers for area/performance and power/performance. Finally, to model multicore scaling, we build a detailed performance model of upper-bound performance and lower-bound core power. The multicore designs we study include single-threaded CPU-like and massively threaded GPU-like multicore chip organizations with symmetric, asymmetric, dynamic, and composed topologies. The study shows that regardless of chip organization and topology, multicore scaling is power limited to a degree not widely appreciated by the computing community. Even at 22 nm (just one year from now), 21% of a fixed-size chip must be powered off, and at 8 nm, this number grows to more than 50%. Through 2024, only 7.9x average speedup is possible across commonly used parallel workloads, leaving a nearly 24-fold gap from a target of doubled performance per generation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validity of the single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities
Amdahl, G. M. (1967) · Proceedings of the April 18-20, 1967, spring joint computer conference on - AFIPS '67 (Spring) · doi:10.1145/1465482.1465560 · Cited by 4,339
The PARSEC benchmark suite: characterization and architectural implications
Bienia, C., Kumar, S., Singh, J. P., & Li, K. (2008) · Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Parallel architectures and compilation techniques · doi:10.1145/1454115.1454128 · Cited by 3,444
Amdahl's Law in the Multicore Era
Hill, M. D., & Marty, M. R. (2008) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2008.209 · Cited by 1,262
Cited by
Is dark silicon useful?: harnessing the four horsemen of the coming dark silicon apocalypse
Taylor, M. B. (2012) · Proceedings of the 49th Annual Design Automation Conference · doi:10.1145/2228360.2228567 · Cited by 296
Amirsoleimani, A., Alibart, F., Yon, V., Xu, J., Pazhouhandeh, M. R., Ecoffey, S., Beilliard, Y., Genov, R., & Drouin, D. (2020) · Advanced Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/aisy.202000115 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Esmaeilzadeh, H., Blem, E., St. Amant, R., Sankaralingam, K., & Burger, D.
- Venue
- ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News
- Published
- 2011-06-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 365-376
- ISSN
- 0163-5964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4255812374
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 19.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2024723.2000108
- The paper
- Esmaeilzadeh, H., Blem, E., St. Amant, R., Sankaralingam, K., & Burger, D. (2011). Dark silicon and the end of multicore scaling. ACM SIGARCH Computer Architecture News. https://doi.org/10.1145/2024723.2000108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.