The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frenetic: a network programming language
Abstract
Modern networks provide a variety of interrelated services including routing, traffic monitoring, load balancing, and access control. Unfortunately, the languages used to program today's networks lack modern features - they are usually defined at the low level of abstraction supplied by the underlying hardware and they fail to provide even rudimentary support for modular programming. As a result, network programs tend to be complicated, error-prone, and difficult to maintain. This paper presents Frenetic, a high-level language for programming distributed collections of network switches. Frenetic provides a declarative query language for classifying and aggregating network traffic as well as a functional reactive combinator library for describing high-level packet-forwarding policies. Unlike prior work in this domain, these constructs are - by design - fully compositional, which facilitates modular reasoning and enables code reuse. This important property is enabled by Frenetic's novel run-time system which manages all of the details related to installing, uninstalling, and querying low-level packet-processing rules on physical switches. Overall, this paper makes three main contributions: (1) We analyze the state-of-the art in languages for programming networks and identify the key limitations; (2) We present a language design that addresses these limitations, using a series of examples to motivate and validate our choices; (3) We describe an implementation of the language and evaluate its performance on several benchmarks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time
Paxson, V. (1999) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(99)00112-7 · Cited by 2,636
(2010) · doi:10.5555/1855711.1855728 · Cited by 970
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
A survey on software-defined network and openflow: From concept to implementation
Hu, F., Hao, Q., & Bao, K. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2326417 · Cited by 752
Towards secure and dependable software-defined networks
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., & Verissimo, P. (2013) · Proceedings of the second ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Hot topics in software defined networking · doi:10.1145/2491185.2491199 · Cited by 697
A roadmap for traffic engineering in SDN-OpenFlow networks
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, A., Wang, P., Luo, M., & Chou, W. (2014) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.06.002 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, N., Harrison, R., Freedman, M. J., Monsanto, C., Rexford, J., Story, A., & Walker, D.
- Venue
- ACM SIGPLAN Notices
- Published
- 2011-09-18
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 279-291
- ISSN
- 0362-1340 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-1160
- OpenAlex
- W2099501333
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Frenetic: a network programming language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2034574.2034812
- The paper
- Foster, N., Harrison, R., Freedman, M. J., Monsanto, C., Rexford, J., Story, A., & Walker, D. (2011). Frenetic: a network programming language. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. https://doi.org/10.1145/2034574.2034812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.