The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks
Abstract
OpenFlow is a great concept, but its original design imposes excessive overheads. It can simplify network and traffic management in enterprise and data center environments, because it enables flow-level control over Ethernet switching and provides global visibility of the flows in the network. However, such fine-grained control and visibility comes with costs: the switch-implementation costs of involving the switch's control-plane too often and the distributed-system costs of involving the OpenFlow controller too frequently, both on flow setups and especially for statistics-gathering. In this paper, we analyze these overheads, and show that OpenFlow's current design cannot meet the needs of high-performance networks. We design and evaluate DevoFlow, a modification of the OpenFlow model which gently breaks the coupling between control and global visibility, in a way that maintains a useful amount of visibility without imposing unnecessary costs. We evaluate DevoFlow through simulations, and find that it can load-balance data center traffic as well as fine-grained solutions, without as much overhead: DevoFlow uses 10--53 times fewer flow table entries at an average switch, and uses 10--42 times fewer control messages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · doi:10.5555/1855711.1855728 · Cited by 970
Self-citation
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
Abstractions for network update
Reitblatt, M., Foster, N., Rexford, J., Schlesinger, C., & Walker, D. (2012) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2012 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication · doi:10.1145/2342356.2342427 · Cited by 584
A roadmap for traffic engineering in SDN-OpenFlow networks
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, A., Wang, P., Luo, M., & Chou, W. (2014) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.06.002 · Cited by 536
A survey: Control plane scalability issues and approaches in Software-Defined Networking (SDN)
Karakus, M., & Durresi, A. (2017) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.017 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Curtis, A. R., Mogul, J. C., Tourrilhes, J., Yalagandula, P., Sharma, P., & Banerjee, S.
- Venue
- ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
- Published
- 2011-08-15
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 254-265
- ISSN
- 0146-4833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4253729210
- Cited by
- 543
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2043164.2018466
- The paper
- Curtis, A. R., Mogul, J. C., Tourrilhes, J., Yalagandula, P., Sharma, P., & Banerjee, S. (2011). DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043164.2018466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.