The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the requirements for successful GPS spoofing attacks
Abstract
An increasing number of wireless applications rely on GPS signals for localization, navigation, and time synchronization. However, civilian GPS signals are known to be susceptible to spoofing attacks which make GPS receivers in range believe that they reside at locations different than their real physical locations. In this paper, we investigate the requirements for successful GPS spoofing attacks on individuals and groups of victims with civilian or military GPS receivers. In particular, we are interested in identifying from which locations and with which precision the attacker needs to generate its signals in order to successfully spoof the receivers. We will show, for example, that any number of receivers can easily be spoofed to one arbitrary location; however, the attacker is restricted to only few transmission locations when spoofing a group of receivers while preserving their constellation. In addition, we investigate the practical aspects of a satellite-lock takeover, in which a victim receives spoofed signals after first being locked on to legitimate GPS signals. Using a civilian GPS signal generator, we perform a set of experiments and find the minimal precision of the attacker's spoofing signals required for covert satellite-lock takeover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and recommendations
Yaacoub, J.-P., Noura, H., Salman, O., & Chehab, A. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100218 · Cited by 727
Unmanned Aircraft Capture and Control Via GPS Spoofing
Kerns, A. J., Shepard, D. P., Bhatti, J. A., & Humphreys, T. E. (2014) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.21513 · Cited by 688
A review on safety failures, security attacks, and available countermeasures for autonomous vehicles
Cui, J., Liew, L. S., Sabaliauskaite, G., & Zhou, F. (2019) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.12.006 · Cited by 298
Defending Airports from UAS: A Survey on Cyber-Attacks and Counter-Drone Sensing Technologies
Lykou, G., Moustakas, D., & Gritzalis, D. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20123537 · Cited by 268
Security analysis of an advanced metering infrastructure
Hansen, A., Staggs, J., & Shenoi, S. (2017) · International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection · doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2017.03.004 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Tippenhauer, N. O., Pöpper, C., Rasmussen, K. B., & Capkun, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2011-10-17
- Pages
- 75-86
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074040836
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the requirements for successful GPS spoofing attacks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2046707.2046719
- The paper
- Tippenhauer, N. O., Pöpper, C., Rasmussen, K. B., & Capkun, S. (2011). On the requirements for successful GPS spoofing attacks. Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2046707.2046719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.