The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension
Open accessAbstract
To discuss the relationship between cognition and hypermedia, it is necessary to distinguish between two kinds of applications: "One encourages those who wish to wander through large clouds of information, gathering knowledge along the way.The other is more directly tied to specific problem-solving, and is quite structured and perhaps even constrained" [20, p. 119].Applications of the first type appear as browsable databases-or hyperbases-that can be freely explored by a reader.In contrast, applications of the second type take the shape of electronic documents-or hyperdocuments-that intentionally guide readers through an information space, controlling their exploration along the lines of a predefined structure.Each type has its particular advantages and encourages different reading strategies.While the first one is better suited to support unconstrained search and information retrieval, the second one is more adequate for tasks requiring deep understanding and learning.As Hammond points out, it "may be fun and perhaps instructive, to open every door and peer inside, but there are many situations where learning is most effective when the freedom of the learner is restricted to a relevant and helpful subset of activities."It is this second type of task-reading a hyperdocument for learning-that we address in our discussion of "designing for comprehension." Comprehension of Hyperdocuments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1993) · Cited by 9,879
Egeth, H., & Kahneman, D. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,972
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,395
Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey
Conklin (1987) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.1987.1663693 · Cited by 2,718
The Usability Engineering Lifecycle
NIELSEN, J. (1993) · Usability Engineering · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052029-2.50007-3 · Cited by 2,657
Furnas, G. W. (1986) · ACM SIGCHI Bulletin · doi:10.1145/22339.22342 · Cited by 1,629
The Foundations of Cognitive Science
(1989) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3072.001.0001 · Cited by 1,444
Furnas, G. W. (1986) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/22627.22342 · Cited by 890
HDM—a model-based approach to hypertext application design
Garzotto, F., Paolini, P., & Schwabe, D. (1993) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/151480.151483 · Cited by 664
SEPIA: a cooperative hypermedia authoring environment
Streitz, N., Haake, J., Hannemann, J., Lemke, A., Schuler, W., Schütt, H., & Thüring, M. (1993) · Proceedings of the ACM conference on Hypertext · doi:10.1145/168466.168479 · Cited by 234
Self-citation
Cited by
When the wait isn’t so bad: The interacting effects of website delay, familiarity, and breadth
Galletta, D. F., Henry, R. M., McCoy, S., & Polak, P. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0073 · Cited by 154
Yoo, C. W., Kim, Y. J., & Sanders, G. L. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.03.001 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Thüring, M., Hannemann, J., & Haake, J. M.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 57-66
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2022320576
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 36.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/208344.208348
- The paper
- Thüring, M., Hannemann, J., & Haake, J. M. (1995). Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/208344.208348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.