The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Practical verified computation with streaming interactive proofs
Open accessAbstract
When delegating computation to a service provider, as in the cloud computing paradigm, we seek some reassurance that the output is correct and complete. Yet recomputing the output as a check is inefficient and expensive, and it may not even be feasible to store all the data locally. We are therefore interested in what can be validated by a streaming (sublinear space) user, who cannot store the full input, or perform the full computation herself. Our aim in this work is to advance a recent line of work on "proof systems" in which the service provider proves the correctness of its output to a user. The goal is to minimize the time and space costs of both parties in generating and checking the proof. Only very recently have there been attempts to implement such proof systems, and thus far these have been quite limited in functionality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series
Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · Cited by 13,154
Pinocchio: Nearly Practical Verifiable Computation
Parno, B., Howell, J., Gentry, C., & Raykova, M. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.47 · Cited by 864
Cited by
Pinocchio: Nearly Practical Verifiable Computation
Parno, B., Howell, J., Gentry, C., & Raykova, M. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2013.47 · Cited by 864
Ligero: Lightweight Sublinear Arguments Without a Trusted Setup
Ames, S., Hazay, C., Ishai, Y., & Venkitasubramaniam, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134104 · Cited by 305
Doubly-Efficient zkSNARKs Without Trusted Setup
Wahby, R. S., Tzialla, I., Shelat, A., Thaler, J., & Walfish, M. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00060 · Cited by 276
Self-citationParno (2016) · doi:10.1145/2856449 · Cited by 212
zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Models
Sun, H., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 on ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3658644.3670334 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Cormode, G., Mitzenmacher, M., & Thaler, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-01-08
- Pages
- 90-112
- OpenAlex
- W2049982182
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical verified computation with streaming interactive proofs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2090236.2090245
- The paper
- Cormode, G., Mitzenmacher, M., & Thaler, J. (2012). Practical verified computation with streaming interactive proofs. Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2090236.2090245
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
