Cited by 98Digital Communication and LanguageSocial Power and Status DynamicsAuthorship Attribution and Profiling

Phrases that signal workplace hierarchy

Gilbert, Eric·2012·Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Abstract

Hierarchy fundamentally shapes how we act at work. In this paper, we explore the relationship between the words people write in workplace email and the rank of the email's recipient. Using the Enron corpus as a dataset, we perform a close study of the words and phrases people send to those above them in the corporate hierarchy versus those at the same level or lower. We find that certain words and phrases are strong predictors. For example, "thought you would" strongly suggests that the recipient outranks the sender, while "let's discuss" implies the opposite. We also find that the phrases people write to their bosses do not demonstrate cognitive processes as often as the ones they write to others. We conclude this paper by interpreting our results and announcing the release of the predictive phrases as a public dataset, perhaps enabling a new class of status-aware applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2145204.2145359

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gilbert, E.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-02-11
Pages
1037-1046
OpenAlex
W1965115311
Cited by
98
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.64
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Keywords
workplace hierarchy, Enron corpus, workplace communication, cognitive processes in writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review