The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functionality and usability
Open accessAbstract
Instead of limiting functionality, usability complements functionality. It affects how and with what effectiveness a system is used, and even whether or not it is used at all.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fundamentals of interactive computer graphics
(1982) · Computer Graphics and Image Processing · doi:10.1016/0146-664x(82)90117-4 · Cited by 1,839
The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation†
Shneiderman, B. (1982) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449298208914450 · Cited by 548
Tupac, J. D. (1963) · Spartan Books · Cited by 530
Design of Man-Computer Dialogues
Martin, J. A. (1990) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 356
Harris, S. (1977) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1977.10647 · Cited by 174
Towards the experimental study of usability
Eason, K. (1984) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449298408901744 · Cited by 156
Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them
Nickerson, R. S. (1999) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1981.0311 · Cited by 143
Consistency and compatibility in human-computer dialogue
Barnard, P. J., Hammond, N. V., Morton, J., Long, J. B., & Clark, I. A. (1981) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(81)80024-7 · Cited by 104
Handbook of screen format design
Galitz, W. O., & Brockmann, R. J. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.1984.6448744 · Cited by 102
Application of guidelines for designing user interface software
Mosier, J. N., & Smith, S. L. (1986) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449298608914497 · Cited by 100
An evaluation of published recommendations on the design of man-computer dialogues
Maguire, M. C. (1982) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(82)80061-8 · Cited by 71
DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR USER-SYSTEM INTERFACE SOFTWARE
Smith, S. L., & Mosier, J. N. (1984) · Cited by 65
Human factors guidelines for terminal interface design
Morland, D. V. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358150.358156 · Cited by 54
The application of human factors to the needs of the novice computer user
Paxton, A. L., & Turner, E. J. (1984) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80014-0 · Cited by 48
On-line user-computer interface
Walther, G. H., & O’Neil, H. F. (1974) · AFIPS National Computer Conference (NCC) · doi:10.1145/1500175.1500255 · Cited by 36
Introducing the interactive computer at work: The users' views
Long, J. B., Hammond, Ν. G. L., Barnard, P. J., Morton, J., & CLARK, I. (1983) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449298308914468 · Cited by 19
User error or computer error? Observations on a statistics package
Davis, R. (1983) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(83)80059-5 · Cited by 14
Making Software User Friendly: An Assessment of Data Entry Performance
Kelster, R. S., & Gallaway, G. R. (1983) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193128302701307 · Cited by 14
Effect of Interface Design on Usability of Message Handling Systems
Goodwin, N. C. (1982) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193128202600117 · Cited by 7
Self-citationMeads, J. A. (1985) · Datamation · Cited by 5
User adaptation in interactive information retrieval
Meadow, C. T. (1983) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630340409 · Cited by 4
Is top-down natural? : some experimental results from non-procedural languages
Finnie, G. R. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80017-7 · Cited by 3
Designing interactive systems for the office of the future
Coulouris, G. (1982) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449298208914434 · Cited by 2
(1982) · Maske und Kothurn · doi:10.7767/muk.1982.28.2.163 · Cited by 1
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bennett J.L., 1978, Proceedings of the Infernational Conference on Cybernetics and Society (Tokyo-Kyoto. Japan, Nov. 3-7). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 1119
- Conrath D.W., 1982, Proceedings, Office Automation Conference, 825
- Davis R., 1983, Int. I. Man-Mach. Stud., 19, 4
- Eason K.D., 1984, Ink J. Man-Mach. Stud., 3, 2
- Foley J.D., 1982, Mass.
- Galitz W.O., 1981, Mass.
- Keister R.S., 1983, Proceedings of the Human Fucfors Society (Norfolk, Va., Oct. 10-14), 1031
- Maguire M., 1982, Int. 1. Man-Mach. Stud., 16, 3
- Meadow C.T., 1983, J. Am. Sot. If. Sci., 34, 4
- Meads J.A., 1985, Dafamnfion, 31, 4
- Moynihan J.A., 1982, Dnfamafion, 284, 116
- Nickerson R., Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud., 25, 469
- Shneiderman B., 1982, Dntamation, 28, 4
- Shneiderman B., Behav. Inf Technot. I, 3, 237
- Smith S.L., 1984, Mass.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication
Adams, D. A., Nelson, R. R., & Todd, P. A. (1992) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249577 · Cited by 3,084
The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction
Doll, W. J., & Torkzadeh, G. (1988) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248851 · Cited by 2,572
Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model1
Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. B., & Cavaye, A. (1997) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249498 · Cited by 1,711
El‐Said, O. A., & Aziz, H. (2021) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287521997567 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, N. C.
- Affiliations
- Mitre (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodwin, Nancy C.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-233
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2007275742
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- usability, functionality, human-computer interaction, system design, user effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review