The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Decoupling algorithms from schedules for easy optimization of image processing pipelines
Open accessAbstract
Using existing programming tools, writing high-performance image processing code requires sacrificing readability, portability, and modularity. We argue that this is a consequence of conflating what computations define the algorithm , with decisions about storage and the order of computation. We refer to these latter two concerns as the schedule , including choices of tiling, fusion, recomputation vs. storage, vectorization, and parallelism. We propose a representation for feed-forward imaging pipelines that separates the algorithm from its schedule, enabling high-performance without sacrificing code clarity. This decoupling simplifies the algorithm specification: images and intermediate buffers become functions over an infinite integer domain, with no explicit storage or boundary conditions. Imaging pipelines are compositions of functions. Programmers separately specify scheduling strategies for the various functions composing the algorithm, which allows them to efficiently explore different optimizations without changing the algorithmic code. We demonstrate the power of this representation by expressing a range of recent image processing applications in an embedded domain specific language called Halide, and compiling them for ARM, x86, and GPUs. Our compiler targets SIMD units, multiple cores, and complex memory hierarchies. We demonstrate that it can handle algorithms such as a camera raw pipeline, the bilateral grid, fast local Laplacian filtering, and image segmentation. The algorithms expressed in our language are both shorter and faster than state-of-the-art implementations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2013) · doi:10.1145/2491956.2462176 · Cited by 885
Ragan-Kelley, J., Barnes, C., Adams, A., Paris, S., Durand, F., & Amarasinghe, S. (2013) · ACM SIGPLAN Notices · doi:10.1145/2499370.2462176 · Cited by 513
Self-citationFast Image Processing with Fully-Convolutional Networks
Chen, Q., Xu, J., & Koltun, V. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.273 · Cited by 341
HIPAcc: A Domain-Specific Language and Compiler for Image Processing
Membarth, R., Reiche, O., Hannig, F., Teich, J., Korner, M., & Eckert, W. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2015.2394802 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Ragan-Kelley, J., Adams, A., Paris, S., Levoy, M., Amarasinghe, S., & Durand, F.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W1989988531
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Decoupling algorithms from schedules for easy optimization of image processing pipelines. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2185520.2185528
- The paper
- Ragan-Kelley, J., Adams, A., Paris, S., Levoy, M., Amarasinghe, S., & Durand, F. (2012). Decoupling algorithms from schedules for easy optimization of image processing pipelines. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/2185520.2185528
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.