Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,302

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems

Open access
Goldwasser, S, Micali, S, Rackoff, C·1985·Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '85

Abstract

How much knowledge should be communicated fir proving a theorem T?Certainly enough to see that T is true, but usually much more.For instance, to prove that a graph is Hamiltonian it suffices to exhibit an Hamiltonian tour.This appears, however, to contain ,much additional knowledge than the single bit "HamiltonianInon-Hamiltonian".We give a computational complexity measure of knowledge and measure tic amount of additional knowlcdgc contained in proofs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/22145.22178

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,302

Metadata

Authors
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rackoff, C.
Venue
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '85
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1985
Pages
291-304
OpenAlex
W2144752539
Cited by
1,302
References
1
FWCI
22.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/22145.22178
The paper
Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., & Rackoff, C. (1985). The knowledge complexity of interactive proof-systems. Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '85. https://doi.org/10.1145/22145.22178

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.