Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 772

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trading group theory for randomness

Babai, L·1985·Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '85

Abstract

In a previous paper [BS] we proved, using the elements of the theory of nilpotent groups, that some of the fundamental computational problems in matriz groups belong to NP. These problems were also shown to belong to coNP, assuming an unproven hypothesis concerning finite simple groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/22145.22192

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 772

Metadata

Authors
Babai, L.
Venue
Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '85
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1985
Pages
421-429
OpenAlex
W2096390054
Cited by
772
References
1
FWCI
8.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trading group theory for randomness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/22145.22192
The paper
Babai, L. (1985). Trading group theory for randomness. Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '85. https://doi.org/10.1145/22145.22192

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.