The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparing information without leaking it
Open accessAbstract
Comparing Information Without Leaking ItHow can two people determine without revealing anything in case they do not?There are surprisingly simple solutions.else to each other whether they possess the same information-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Wigderson, A. (1987) · Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM conference on Theory of computing - STOC '87 · doi:10.1145/28395.28420 · Cited by 3,590
New hash functions and their use in authentication and set equality
Wegman, M. N., & Carter, J. L. (1981) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(81)90033-7 · Cited by 1,402
Cited by
Privacy Preserving Data Mining
Lindell, Y., & Pinkas, B. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44598-6_3 · Cited by 1,077
Data Streams: Algorithms and Applications
Muthukrishnan, S. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1561/0400000002 · Cited by 718
Privacy Preserving Data Mining
Lindell, & Pinkas (2002) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/s00145-001-0019-2 · Cited by 668
Secure Multiparty Computation for Privacy-Preserving Data Mining
Lindell, Y., & Pinkas, B. (2009) · Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality · doi:10.29012/jpc.v1i1.566 · Cited by 554
Metadata
- Authors
- Fagin, R., Naor, M., & Winkler, P.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 77-85
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2093507182
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing information without leaking it. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/229459.229469
- The paper
- Fagin, R., Naor, M., & Winkler, P. (1996). Comparing information without leaking it. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/229459.229469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
