The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Software protection and simulation on oblivious RAMs
Open accessAbstract
Software protection is one of the most important issues concerning computer practice. There exist many heuristics and ad-hoc methods for protection, but the problem as a whole has not received the theoretical treatment it deserves. In this paper, we provide theoretical treatment of software protection. We reduce the problem of software protection to the problem of efficient simulation on oblivious RAM. A machine is oblivious if thhe sequence in which it accesses memory locations is equivalent for any two inputs with the same running time. For example, an oblivious Turing Machine is one for which the movement of the heads on the tapes is identical for each computation. (Thus, the movement is independent of the actual input.) What is the slowdown in the running time of a machine, if it is required to be oblivious? In 1979, Pippenger and Fischer showed how a two-tape oblivious Turing Machine can simulate, on-line, a one-tape Turing Machine, with a logarithmic slowdown in the running time. We show an analogous result for the random-access machine (RAM) model of computation. In particular, we show how to do an on-line simulation of an arbitrary RAM by a probabilistic oblivious RAM with a polylogaithmic slowdown in the running time. On the other hand, we show that a logarithmic slowdown is a lower bound.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chor, B., Kushilevitz, E., Goldreich, O., & Sudan, M. (1998) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/293347.293350 · Cited by 1,612
Self-citationSecure Conjunctive Keyword Search over Encrypted Data
Golle, P., Staddon, J., & Waters, B. (2004) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24852-1_3 · Cited by 773
Recursive composition and bootstrapping for SNARKS and proof-carrying data
Bitansky, N., Canetti, R., Chiesa, A., & Tromer, E. (2013) · Proceedings of the forty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing · doi:10.1145/2488608.2488623 · Cited by 304
Computationally private information retrieval (extended abstract)
Chor, B., & Gilboa, N. (1997) · Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '97 · doi:10.1145/258533.258609 · Cited by 249
Security Vulnerabilities of SGX and Countermeasures: A Survey
Fei, S., Yan, Z., Ding, W., & Xie, H. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3456631 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldreich, O., & Ostrovsky, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1996-05
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 431-473
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W1988374166
- Cited by
- 1,617
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Software protection and simulation on oblivious RAMs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/233551.233553
- The paper
- Goldreich, O., & Ostrovsky, R. (1996). Software protection and simulation on oblivious RAMs. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/233551.233553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.