Cited by 1,612Cryptography and Data SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCloud Data Security Solutions

Private information retrieval

Open access
Chor, Benny, Kushilevitz, Eyal, Goldreich, Oded, Sudan, Madhu·1998·Journal of the ACM

Abstract

Publicly accessible databases are an indispensable resource for retrieving up-to-date information. But they also pose a significant risk to the privacy of the user, since a curious database operator can follow the user's queries and infer what the user is after. Indeed, in cases where the users' intentions are to be kept secret, users are often cautious about accessing the database. It can be shown that when accessing a single database, to completely guarantee the privacy of the user, the whole database should be down-loaded; namely n bits should be communicated (where n is the number of bits in the database). In this work, we investigate whether by replicating the database, more efficient solutions to the private retrieval problem can be obtained. We describe schemes that enable a user to access k replicated copies of a database ( k ≥2) and privately retrieve information stored in the database. This means that each individual server (holding a replicated copy of the database) gets no information on the identity of the item retrieved by the user. Our schemes use the replication to gain substantial saving. In particular, we present a two-server scheme with communication complexity O(n 1/3 ).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/293347.293350

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) has a long history under AutoML, but it mainly concerns improving model accuracy rather than communication and computing efficacy for mobile devices.

    “Hyperparameter optimization (HPO) has a long history under the framework of AutoML [395, 273, 277], but it mainly concerns how to improve the model accuracy [64, 426, 374, 180] rather than communication and computing efficacy for mobile devices.”

    From Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2021) · cites this paper as [273]

    The Introduction and §2.4 (pages not supplied) discuss private information retrieval, including its communication and computational complexity. Searches for hyperparameter optimization, AutoML, model accuracy, and mobile devices found no passage addressing what HPO mainly concerns. The paper’s focus on communication complexity does not, by itself, contradict a claim about HPO. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. CHOR, B., AND GILBOA, N. 1997. Computationally private information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on the Theory of Computing (El Paso, Tex., May 4 -6). ACM, New York, pp. 304 -313.
  2. DENNING, D. 1982. Crytography and Data Security. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.
  3. ULLMAN, J. D. 1982. Principles of Database Systems, 2nd ed. Computer Science Press, Potomac, Md. RECEIVED APRIL 1996; REVISED MARCH 1998; ACCEPTED APRIL 1998 Journal of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 6, November 1998.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chor, B., Kushilevitz, E., Goldreich, O., & Sudan, M.
Affiliations
  • Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
  • Technion, Haifa, Israel
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of the ACM
Published
1998-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
965-981
ISSN
  • 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-735X
OpenAlex
W2073346043
Cited by
1,612
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 92 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 93 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 55
FWCI
10.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
private information retrieval, database privacy, database replication, communication complexity, query privacy, information-theoretic privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review