The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs
Abstract
The development of a city gradually fosters different functional regions, such as educational areas and business districts. In this paper, we propose a framework (titled DRoF) that Discovers Regions of different Functions in a city using both human mobility among regions and points of interests (POIs) located in a region. Specifically, we segment a city into disjointed regions according to major roads, such as highways and urban express ways. We infer the functions of each region using a topic-based inference model, which regards a region as a document, a function as a topic, categories of POIs (e.g., restaurants and shopping malls) as metadata (like authors, affiliations, and key words), and human mobility patterns (when people reach/leave a region and where people come from and leave for) as words. As a result, a region is represented by a distribution of functions, and a function is featured by a distribution of mobility patterns. We further identify the intensity of each function in different locations. The results generated by our framework can benefit a variety of applications, including urban planning, location choosing for a business, and social recommendations. We evaluated our method using large-scale and real-world datasets, consisting of two POI datasets of Beijing (in 2010 and 2011) and two 3-month GPS trajectory datasets (representing human mobility) generated by over 12,000 taxicabs in Beijing in 2010 and 2011 respectively. The results justify the advantages of our approach over baseline methods solely using POIs or human mobility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blei, D. M. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2133806.2133826 · Cited by 5,516
Cited by
U-Air: when urban air quality inference meets big data
Zheng, Y., Liu, F., & Hsieh, H.-P. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2488188 · Cited by 916
Self-citationFadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
Methodologies for Cross-Domain Data Fusion: An Overview
Zheng, Y. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Big Data · doi:10.1109/tbdata.2015.2465959 · Cited by 454
Self-citationMapping Urban Land Use by Using Landsat Images and Open Social Data
Hu, T., Yang, J., Li, X., & Gong, P. (2016) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs8020151 · Cited by 389
Classification of Remote Sensing Images Using EfficientNet-B3 CNN Model With Attention
Alhichri, H., Alswayed, A. S., Bazi, Y., Ammour, N., & Alajlan, N. A. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3051085 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, J., Zheng, Y., & Xie, X.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-08-12
- Pages
- 186-194
- OpenAlex
- W2153207204
- Cited by
- 1,099
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 75.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2339530.2339561
- The paper
- Yuan, J., Zheng, Y., & Xie, X. (2012). Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and POIs. Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2339530.2339561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.