The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications
Open accessAbstract
Limiting the overhead of frequent events on the control plane is essential for realizing a scalable Software-Defined Network. One way of limiting this overhead is to process frequent events in the data plane. This requires modifying switches and comes at the cost of visibility in the control plane. Taking an alternative route, we propose Kandoo, a framework for preserving scalability without changing switches. Kandoo has two layers of controllers: (i) the bottom layer is a group of controllers with no interconnection, and no knowledge of the network-wide state, and (ii) the top layer is a logically centralized controller that maintains the network-wide state. Controllers at the bottom layer run only local control applications (i.e., applications that can function using the state of a single switch) near datapaths. These controllers handle most of the frequent events and effectively shield the top layer. Kandoo's design enables network operators to replicate local controllers on demand and relieve the load on the top layer, which is the only potential bottleneck in terms of scalability. Our evaluations show that a network controlled by Kandoo has an order of magnitude lower control channel consumption compared to normal OpenFlow networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alizadeh, M., Greenberg, A., Maltz, D. A., Padhye, J., Patel, P., Prabhakar, B., Sengupta, S., & Sridharan, M. (2010) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference · doi:10.1145/1851182.1851192 · Cited by 1,877
A network in a laptop: rapid prototyping for software-defined networks
Lantz, B., Heller, B., & McKeown, N. (2010) · Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks · doi:10.1145/1868447.1868466 · Cited by 1,826
Onix: a distributed control platform for large-scale production networks
Koponen, T., Casado, M., Gude, N. S., Stribling, J., Poutievski, L., Zhu, M., Ramanathan, R., Iwata, Y., Inoue, H., Hama, T., et al. (2010) · doi:10.5555/1924943.1924968 · Cited by 1,212
DevoFlow: scaling flow management for high-performance networks
Curtis, A. R., Mogul, J. C., Tourrilhes, J., Yalagandula, P., Sharma, P., & Banerjee, S. (2011) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2011 conference · doi:10.1145/2018436.2018466 · Cited by 959
HyperFlow: a distributed control plane for OpenFlow
Tootoonchian, A., & Ganjali, Y. (2010) · Cited by 931
Self-citationANTS: a toolkit for building and dynamically deploying network protocols
Wetherall, D. J., Guttag, J. V., & Tennenhouse, D. L. (2002) · 1998 IEEE Open Architectures and Network Programming · doi:10.1109/opnarc.1998.662048 · Cited by 593
Scalable flow-based networking with DIFANE
Yu, M., Rexford, J., Freedman, M. J., & Wang, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 conference · doi:10.1145/1851182.1851224 · Cited by 525
Extending Networking into the Virtualization Layer.
Pfaff, B., Pettit, J., Amidon, K., Casado, M., Koponen, T., & Shenker, S. J. (2009) · Cited by 510
Mahout: Low-overhead datacenter traffic management using end-host-based elephant detection
Curtis, A. R., Kim, W., & Yalagandula, P. (2011) · 2011 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM · doi:10.1109/infcom.2011.5934956 · Cited by 402
Design and implementation of a consolidated middlebox architecture
Sekar, V., Egi, N., Ratnasamy, S., Reiter, M. K., & Shi, G. (2012) · UC Berkeley · Cited by 402
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
A roadmap for traffic engineering in SDN-OpenFlow networks
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, A., Wang, P., Luo, M., & Chou, W. (2014) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2014.06.002 · Cited by 536
Distributed SDN Control: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
Bannour, F., Souihi, S., & Mellouk, A. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2782482 · Cited by 452
Metadata
- Authors
- Hassas Yeganeh, S., & Ganjali, Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-08-13
- Pages
- 19-24
- OpenAlex
- W2164336170
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 39.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2342441.2342446
- The paper
- Hassas Yeganeh, S., & Ganjali, Y. (2012). Kandoo: a framework for efficient and scalable offloading of control applications. Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks. https://doi.org/10.1145/2342441.2342446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
