CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 95

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time-sensitive query auto-completion

Shokouhi, Milad, Radinsky, Kira·2012·Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
DOI 10.1145/2348283.2348364
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Query auto-completion (QAC) is a common feature in modern search engines. High quality QAC candidates enhance search experience by saving users time that otherwise would be spent on typing each character or word sequentially.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2348283.2348364

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.5555/1699648.1699650 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1963405.1963424 · DOI
  3. Baraglia R., 2010, Proc. RIAO, 182
  4. 10.1145/1008992.1009048 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_5 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/11564096_47 · DOI
  7. 10.5555/944919.944937 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/1559845.1559919 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/1060745.1060752 · DOI
  10. Cho H., 2009, Google Inc
  11. 10.1145/1835449.1835471 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1145/2009916.2009933 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/2.60879 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/1772690.1772725 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/asi.v61:7 · DOI
  16. 10.1145/1718487.1718489 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/APWeb.2010.13 · DOI
  18. 10.1145/1008992.1009066 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.015 · DOI
  20. 10.1145/1526709.1526760 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1247715.1247720 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.5555/1887759.1887796 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/1935826.1935862 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1145/956863.956951 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1109/ICDMW.2008.53 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/1571941.1572085 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Nandi A., 2007, Proc. VLDB, 219
  28. 10.1137/0916069 · DOI
  29. Shimshoni Y., 2009, Google Inc
  30. 10.1145/2009916.2010104 · DOI
  31. 10.1145/1007568.1007586 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.ipm.2006.06.005 · DOI
  33. Zhang R., 2009, Proc. NAACL-Short, 165

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 95

Metadata

Authors
Shokouhi, M., & Radinsky, K.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
Venue
Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-08-12
Pages
601-610
DOI
10.1145/2348283.2348364
Cited by
95
References
1
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review