The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Foveated 3D graphics
Abstract
We exploit the falloff of acuity in the visual periphery to accelerate graphics computation by a factor of 5-6 on a desktop HD display (1920x1080). Our method tracks the user's gaze point and renders three image layers around it at progressively higher angular size but lower sampling rate. The three layers are then magnified to display resolution and smoothly composited. We develop a general and efficient antialiasing algorithm easily retrofitted into existing graphics code to minimize "twinkling" artifacts in the lower-resolution layers. A standard psychophysical model for acuity falloff assumes that minimum detectable angular size increases linearly as a function of eccentricity. Given the slope characterizing this falloff, we automatically compute layer sizes and sampling rates. The result looks like a full-resolution image but reduces the number of pixels shaded by a factor of 10-15. We performed a user study to validate these results. It identifies two levels of foveation quality: a more conservative one in which users reported foveated rendering quality as equivalent to or better than non-foveated when directly shown both, and a more aggressive one in which users were unable to correctly label as increasing or decreasing a short quality progression relative to a high-quality foveated reference. Based on this user study, we obtain a slope value for the model of 1.32-1.65 arc minutes per degree of eccentricity. This allows us to predict two future advantages of foveated rendering: (1) bigger savings with larger, sharper displays than exist currently (e.g. 100 times speedup at a field of view of 70° and resolution matching foveal acuity), and (2) a roughly linear (rather than quadratic or worse) increase in rendering cost with increasing display field of view, for planar displays at a constant sharpness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eye Tracking in Virtual Reality: a Broad Review of Applications and Challenges
Adhanom, I. B., MacNeilage, P., & Folmer, E. (2023) · Virtual Reality · doi:10.1007/s10055-022-00738-z · Cited by 325
Impact of Foveated Rendering on Procedural Task Training
Radkowski, R., & Raul, S. (2019) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-21607-8_20 · Cited by 5
Indoor view graph: A model to capture route and configurational information
Hamzei, E., De Cock, L., Tomko, M., Van de Weghe, N., & Winter, S. (2024) · Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science · doi:10.1177/23998083241241598 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Guenter, B., Finch, M., Drucker, S., Tan, D., & Snyder, J.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2012-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W1968607211
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foveated 3D graphics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2366145.2366183
- The paper
- Guenter, B., Finch, M., Drucker, S., Tan, D., & Snyder, J. (2012). Foveated 3D graphics. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/2366145.2366183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.