Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictability of individuals' mobility with high-resolution positioning data

Lin, Miao, Hsu, Wen-Jing, Lee, Zhuo Qi·2012·Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing

Abstract

The ability to foresee the next moves of a user is crucial to ubiquitous computing. Disregarding major differences in individuals' routines, recent ground-breaking analysis on mobile phone data suggests high predictability in mobility. By nature, however, mobile phone data offer very low spatial and temporal resolutions. It remains largely unknown how the predictability changes with respect to different spatial/temporal scales. Using high-resolution GPS data, this paper investigates the scaling effects on predictability. Given specified spatial-temporal scales, recorded trajectories are encoded into long strings of distinct locations, and several information-theoretic measures of predictability are derived. Somewhat surprisingly, high predictability is still present at very high spatial/temporal resolutions. Moreover, the predictability is independent of the overall mobility area covered. This suggests highly regular mobility behaviors. Moreover, by varying the scales over a wide range, an invariance is observed which suggests that certain trade-offs between the predicting accuracy and spatial-temporal resolution are unavoidable. As many applications in ubiquitous computing concern mobility, these findings should have direct implications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2370216.2370274

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1007/s00779-003-0240-0 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/313451.313457 · DOI
  3. 10.1145/1641804.1641873 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/18.144706 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nature06958 · DOI
  6. R. Hariharan and K. Toyama. Project lachesis: parsing and modeling location histories. In GIS, pages 106--124, 2004.
  7. 10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00019-9 · DOI
  8. B. Jensen, J. Larsen, K. Jensen, J. Larsen, and L. Hansen. Estimating human predictability from mobile sensor data. In MLSP, pages 196--201, 2010.
  9. 10.1109/ICDE.2008.4497415 · DOI
  10. 10.5555/2391952.2392009 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/449287a · DOI
  12. 10.1109/18.669425 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/11853565_15 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/1409635.1409677 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1145/1526709.1526816 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Lin, M., Hsu, W.-J., & Lee, Z. Q.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University
Venue
Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2012-09-05
Pages
381-390
Cited by
72
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review