OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection
Abstract
Article OBBTree: a hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection Share on Authors: S. Gottschalk Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCView Profile , M. C. Lin Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC and U.S. Army Research Office Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC and U.S. Army Research OfficeView Profile , D. Manocha Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCView Profile Authors Info & Claims SIGGRAPH '96: Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesAugust 1996 Pages 171–180https://doi.org/10.1145/237170.237244Online:01 August 1996Publication History 959citation5,396DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations959Total Downloads5,396Last 12 Months262Last 6 weeks40 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Jerk comfort thresholds are typically below 1 m/s3, with values between 1 and 3 m/s3 often associated with reduced comfort or instability.
“In terms of jerk, comfort thresholds are typically below 1m / s 3 , with values between 1 and 3m / s 3 often associated with reduced comfort or instability [32].”
From Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving (2026) · cites this paper as [32]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bernard, O., Lalande, A., Zotti, C., Cervenansky, F., Yang, X., Heng, P.-A., Cetin, I., Lekadir, K., Camara, O., Gonzalez Ballester, M. A., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2837502 · Cited by 2,431 · see citing works
Graf, B., Reiser, U., Hagele, M., Mauz, K., & Klein, P. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts · doi:10.1109/arso.2009.5587059 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Standardized Evaluation System for Left Ventricular Segmentation Algorithms in 3D Echocardiography
Bernard, O., Bosch, J. G., Heyde, B., Alessandrini, M., Barbosa, D., Camarasu-Pop, S., Cervenansky, F., Valette, S., Mirea, O., Bernier, M., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2503890 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Torrents-Barrena, J., López-Velazco, R., Piella, G., Masoller, N., Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B., Gratacós, E., Eixarch, E., Ceresa, M., & Ángel González Ballester, M. (2019) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.104993 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Ethics-Aware Safe Reinforcement Learning for Rare-Event Risk Control in Interactive Urban Driving
Li, D., & Okhrin, O. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2026.3708405
- Authors
- Gottschalk, S., Lin, M. C., & Manocha, D.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1996-08
- Pages
- 171-180
- OpenAlex
- W1999250663
- Cited by
- 2,081
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 72
- FWCI
- 19.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM SIGGRAPH Conference (SIGGRAPH) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Keywords
- oriented bounding boxes, collision detection, interference detection, convex polyhedra, spatial partitioning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
