The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back
Abstract
We present AutoTutor and Affective AutoTutor as examples of innovative 21 st century interactive intelligent systems that promote learning and engagement. AutoTutor is an intelligent tutoring system that helps students compose explanations of difficult concepts in Newtonian physics and enhances computer literacy and critical thinking by interacting with them in natural language with adaptive dialog moves similar to those of human tutors. AutoTutor constructs a cognitive model of students' knowledge levels by analyzing the text of their typed or spoken responses to its questions. The model is used to dynamically tailor the interaction toward individual students' zones of proximal development. Affective AutoTutor takes the individualized instruction and human-like interactivity to a new level by automatically detecting and responding to students' emotional states in addition to their cognitive states. Over 20 controlled experiments comparing AutoTutor with ecological and experimental controls such reading a textbook have consistently yielded learning improvements of approximately one letter grade after brief 30--60-minute interactions. Furthermore, Affective AutoTutor shows even more dramatic improvements in learning than the original AutoTutor system, particularly for struggling students with low domain knowledge. In addition to providing a detailed description of the implementation and evaluation of AutoTutor and Affective AutoTutor, we also discuss new and exciting technologies motivated by AutoTutor such as AutoTutor-Lite, Operation ARIES, GuruTutor, DeepTutor, MetaTutor, and AutoMentor. We conclude this article with our vision for future work on interactive and engaging intelligent tutoring systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241 · cited 2×
“1995; Heider 1958; Weiner 1986], empathy [Dweck 2002; Lepper and Chabay 1988], cognitive disequilibrium during learning [Festinger 1957; Graesser and Olde 2003; Piaget 1952], and”
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,122
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition: Foundations
Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & AU (1986) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · Cited by 15,686
Politeness : Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P. (1987) · Cited by 11,894
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
Newcomb, T., & Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 11,822
Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage
Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Gumperz, J. J. (1987) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813085 · Cited by 10,438
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) · Cited by 9,342
Cited by
Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 · Cited by 1,010
Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Multimodal Affect Detection Systems
D'mello, S. K., & Kory, J. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2682899 · Cited by 628
Self-citationLearner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481 · Cited by 437
Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans
Baker, R. S. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0105-0 · Cited by 425
Metadata
- Authors
- D'mello, S., & Graesser, A.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-39
- ISSN
- 2160-6455 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-6463
- OpenAlex
- W1974219072
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 144
- FWCI
- 16.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2395123.2395128
- The paper
- D'mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). AutoTutor and affective autotutor: Learning by talking with cognitively and emotionally intelligent computers that talk back. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2395123.2395128
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.