The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services
Open accessAbstract
article Free Access Share on The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services Authors: Robert Kraut Human Computer Interaction Institute and The Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University Human Computer Interaction Institute and The Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon UniversityView Profile , William Scherlis Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon UniversityView Profile , Tridas Mukhopadhyay School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon UniversityView Profile , Jane Manning University of Sydney University of SydneyView Profile , Sara Kiesler Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University Department of Social and Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon UniversityView Profile Authors Info & Claims Communications of the ACMVolume 39Issue 12Dec. 1996 pp 55–63https://doi.org/10.1145/240483.240493Published:01 December 1996Publication History 164citation1,097DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations164Total Downloads1,097Last 12 Months25Last 6 weeks12 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring the Functional Components of Social Support
Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T., & Hoberman, H. M. (1985) · Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5115-0_5 · Cited by 2,296
Cited by
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Self-citationGender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00032-7 · Cited by 592
Internet use and psychological well-being: A meta-analysis
Huang, C. (2010) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2009.0217 · Cited by 359
Loneliness, Self-Disclosure, and ICQ ("I Seek You") Use
Leung, L. (2002) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/109493102760147240 · Cited by 222
Extraordinary computing: religion as a lens for reconsidering the home
Wyche, S. P., & Grinter, R. E. (2009) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1518701.1518817 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2048628193
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 64.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/240483.240493
- The paper
- Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/240483.240493
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
