The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Outlier ensembles: position paper
Abstract
Ensemble analysis is a widely used meta-algorithm for many data mining problems such as classification and clustering. Numerous ensemble-based algorithms have been proposed in the literature for these problems. Compared to the clustering and classification problems, ensemble analysis has been studied in a limited way in the outlier detection literature. In some cases, ensemble analysis techniques have been implicitly used by many outlier analysis algorithms, but the approach is often buried deep into the algorithm and not formally recognized as a general-purpose meta-algorithm. This is in spite of the fact that this problem is rather important in the context of outlier analysis. This paper discusses the various methods which are used in the literature for outlier ensembles and the general principles by which such analysis can be made more effective. A discussion is also provided on how outlier ensembles relate to the ensemble-techniques used commonly for other data mining problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2008) · 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2008.17 · Cited by 6,601
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/335191.335388 · Cited by 5,207
LOF: identifying density-based local outliers
Breunig, M. M., Kriegel, H.-P., Ng, R. T., & Sander, J. (2000) · Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/342009.335388 · Cited by 4,149
Hawkins, D. M. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-94-015-3994-4 · Cited by 2,982
Cited by
Progress in Outlier Detection Techniques: A Survey
Wang, H., Bah, M. J., & Hammad, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2932769 · Cited by 523
Pang, G., Cao, L., Chen, L., Lian, D., & Liu, H. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11692 · Cited by 59
Explainable outlier detection: What, for Whom and Why?
Sejr, J. H., & Schneider-Kamp, A. (2021) · Machine Learning with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100172 · Cited by 32
Random Subspace Mixture Models for Interpretable Anomaly Detection
Savkli, C., & Schwartz, C. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.06283 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Aggarwal, C. C.
- Venue
- ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter
- Published
- 2013-04-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 49-58
- ISSN
- 1931-0145 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-0153
- OpenAlex
- W2082938293
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Outlier ensembles: position paper. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2481244.2481252
- The paper
- Aggarwal, C. C. (2013). Outlier ensembles: position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter. https://doi.org/10.1145/2481244.2481252
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.