Cited by 93Innovative Human-Technology InteractionDesign Education and PracticeInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Brownies or bags-of-stuff?: domain expertise in cooperative inquiry with children

Yip, Jason, Clegg, Tamara, Bonsignore, Elizabeth, Gelderblom, Helene, Rhodes, Emily, Druin, Allison·2013·Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

Abstract

Researchers often utilize the method of Participatory Design to work together with users to enhance technology. In particular, Cooperative Inquiry is a method of Participatory Design with children that involves full partnership between researchers and children. One important challenge designers face in creating learning technologies is that these technologies are often situated in specific activities and contexts. While children involved in these activities may have subject expertise (e.g., science inquiry process), they may not have design expertise (e.g., design aesthetics, usability). In contrast, children with design expertise may be familiar with how to design with researchers, but may not have subject expertise. Little is known about the distinction between child design and subject experts in Cooperative Inquiry. In this paper, we examine two cases -- involving children with design expertise and those with subject expertise -- to better understand the design process for both groups of children. The data from this study suggests that similarities do exist between the two cases, but that design and subject knowledge does play a significant role in how children co-design learning technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2485760.2485763

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yip, J., Clegg, T., Bonsignore, E., Gelderblom, H., Rhodes, E., & Druin, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa
Venue
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-06-24
Pages
201-210
OpenAlex
W2021123264
Cited by
93
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.79
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
participatory design, cooperative inquiry, design expertise, subject matter expertise, children as designers, educational technology design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review