Cited by 36Design Education and PracticeInnovative Human-Technology InteractionInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

How Ideas make it through to Designs: Process and Practice

Read, Janet C., Fitton, Daniel, Sim, Gavin, Horton, Matt·2016·Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

This paper describes a process called RAId (Rapid Analysis of design Ideas), which assists, in the ethical and inclusive analysis of large sets of design data. It is described against an activity with 120 teenagers working in small groups contributing ideas for the design of an interactive water-drinking bottle. Four investigators systematically examined fifty designs from the teenagers using six different lenses -- two concerned with the purpose of the designed technology (hydration and re-use), two with its desirability (aesthetics and cool) and two with the product concept (business and innovation). The investigators used these lenses to focus their examination. Each proposed a candidate solution based on what they had seen from the teen designs. The resulting concepts are examined against the teenagers' ideas that inspired them with attention being paid to when, and how often, ideas were put in mind. This analysis revealed three different idea types, core, add-ons and novel, each of which needed different treatment to bring it to fruition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2971485.2971560

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Read, J. C., Fitton, D., Sim, G., & Horton, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lancashire (GB)
  • University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
Venue
Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-10-23
Pages
1-10
OpenAlex
W2535633834
Cited by
36
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.89
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/1000720/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
RAID, adolescents, hydration, water reuse, aesthetics, desirability, product concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review