How Ideas make it through to Designs: Process and Practice
Abstract
This paper describes a process called RAId (Rapid Analysis of design Ideas), which assists, in the ethical and inclusive analysis of large sets of design data. It is described against an activity with 120 teenagers working in small groups contributing ideas for the design of an interactive water-drinking bottle. Four investigators systematically examined fifty designs from the teenagers using six different lenses -- two concerned with the purpose of the designed technology (hydration and re-use), two with its desirability (aesthetics and cool) and two with the product concept (business and innovation). The investigators used these lenses to focus their examination. Each proposed a candidate solution based on what they had seen from the teen designs. The resulting concepts are examined against the teenagers' ideas that inspired them with attention being paid to when, and how often, ideas were put in mind. This analysis revealed three different idea types, core, add-ons and novel, each of which needed different treatment to bring it to fruition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Churchman, C. W. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 1,352 · see citing works
The role of children in the design of new technology
(2002) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449290110108659 · Cited by 1,071 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These roles have been modelled by Druin who layered children’s’ roles as participants in HCI work onto an onion model [5], and by Read et.”
Method(2002) · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Druin, A. (1999) · doi:10.1145/302979.303166 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook
(2002) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781410606723 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure for Engagement
Grudin, J. T., & Pruitt, J. (2002) · Cited by 474 · see citing works
The design of children's technology
Druin, A. (1998) · Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. eBooks · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Designing for or designing with? Informant design for interactive learning environments
Scaife, M., Rogers, Y., Aldrich, F. K., & Davies, M. (1997) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/258549.258789 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Participatory design in community informatics
Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2007) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.007 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., & Keay‐Bright, W. (2011) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.587013 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design
Frauenberger, C., Good, J., Fitzpatrick, G., & Iversen, O. S. (2014) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.004 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Guha, M. L., Druin, A., Chipman, G., Fails, J. A., Simms, S., & Farber, A. (2004) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/1017833.1017838 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Brownies or bags-of-stuff?: domain expertise in cooperative inquiry with children
Yip, J., Clegg, T., Bonsignore, E., Gelderblom, H., Rhodes, E., & Druin, A. (2013) · Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/2485760.2485763 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Read, J. C., Fitton, D., & Horton, M. (2014) · ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/2593968.2593986 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationChapter 3: Children as Our Technology Design Partners+
Druin, A., Bederson, B. B., Boltman, A., et al. (1998) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Kam, M., Ramachandran, D., Raghavan, A., et al. (2006) · ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/1139073.1139085 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Design with and for disaffected teenagers
Mazzone, E., Read, J. C., & Beale, R. (2008) · doi:10.1145/1463160.1463192 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationChildren designers in the museum
Ρούσσου, Μ., Kavalieratou, E., & Doulgeridis, M. (2007) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/1297277.1297292 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Mumford, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/153571.214824 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Considering context, content, management, and engagement in design activities with children
Mazzone, E., Iivari, N., Tikkanen, R., et al. (2010) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/1810543.1810556 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
School friendly participatory research activities with children
Horton, M., Read, J. C., Mazzone, E., et al. (2012) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/2212776.2223759 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationMyData Approach for Personal Health -- A Service Design Case for Young Athletes
Häkkilä, J., Alhonsuo, M., Virtanen, L., Rantakari, J., Colley, A., & Koivumäki, T. (2016) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2016.436 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Understanding Children’s Contributions during Informant Design
Mazzone, E., Read, J. C., & Beale, R. (2008) · Electronic workshops in computing · doi:10.14236/ewic/hci2008.34 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationChildren as Design Partners and Testers for a Children’s Digital Library
Theng, Y. L., Nasir, N. M., Thimbleby, H., et al. (2000) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45268-0_23 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
User-oriented design and tangible interaction for kindergarten children
Marco, J., Cerezo, E., Baldasarri, S., et al. (2009) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/1551788.1551825 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Iversen, O. S., Smith, R. C., & Dindler, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children · doi:10.1145/3078072.3079725 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“[31], better referred to as “crowdsourcing of ideas,” as children do not necessarily influence the final outcome here and little emphasis is put on design as a mutual learning process as manifested in PD theory [36].”
BackgroundInfluentialADHD and Technology Research – Investigated by Neurodivergent Readers
Spiel, K., Hornecker, E., Williams, R. M., & Good, J. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517592 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
- Authors
- Read, J. C., Fitton, D., Sim, G., & Horton, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-23
- Pages
- 1-10
- OpenAlex
- W2535633834
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/1000720/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Keywords
- RAID, adolescents, hydration, water reuse, aesthetics, desirability, product concept
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review