Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Denser than the densest subgraph: extracting optimal quasi-cliques with quality guarantees

Tsourakakis, Charalampos, Bonchi, Francesco, Gionis, Aristides, Gullo, Francesco, Tsiarli, Maria·2013·Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining

Abstract

Finding dense subgraphs is an important graph-mining task with many applications. Given that the direct optimization of edge density is not meaningful, as even a single edge achieves maximum density, research has focused on optimizing alternative density functions. A very popular among such functions is the average degree, whose maximization leads to the well-known densest-subgraph notion. Surprisingly enough, however, densest subgraphs are typically large graphs, with small edge density and large diameter.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2487575.2487645

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Tsourakakis, C., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Gullo, F., & Tsiarli, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-08-11
Pages
104-112
OpenAlex
W2119757574
Cited by
294
References
29
FWCI
14.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Denser than the densest subgraph: extracting optimal quasi-cliques with quality guarantees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2487575.2487645
The paper
Tsourakakis, C., Bonchi, F., Gionis, A., Gullo, F., & Tsiarli, M. (2013). Denser than the densest subgraph: extracting optimal quasi-cliques with quality guarantees. Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2487575.2487645

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.