Catching Synchronized Behaviors in Large Networks: A Graph Mining Approach
Abstract
Given a directed graph of millions of nodes, how can we automatically spot anomalous, suspicious nodes judging only from their connectivity patterns? Suspicious graph patterns show up in many applications, from Twitter users who buy fake followers, manipulating the social network, to botnet members performing distributed denial of service attacks, disturbing the network traffic graph. We propose a fast and effective method, C atch S ync , which exploits two of the tell-tale signs left in graphs by fraudsters: (a) synchronized behavior: suspicious nodes have extremely similar behavior patterns because they are often required to perform some task together (such as follow the same user); and (b) rare behavior: their connectivity patterns are very different from the majority. We introduce novel measures to quantify both concepts (“synchronicity” and “normality”) and we propose a parameter-free algorithm that works on the resulting synchronicity-normality plots. Thanks to careful design, C atch S ync has the following desirable properties: (a) it is scalable to large datasets, being linear in the graph size; (b) it is parameter free ; and (c) it is side-information-oblivious : it can operate using only the topology, without needing labeled data, nor timing information, and the like., while still capable of using side information if available. We applied C atch S ync on three large, real datasets, 1-billion-edge Twitter social graph, 3-billion-edge, and 12-billion-edge Tencent Weibo social graphs, and several synthetic ones; C atch S ync consistently outperforms existing competitors, both in detection accuracy by 36% on Twitter and 20% on Tencent Weibo, as well as in speed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several group detectors implement graph-based approaches and aim at spotting suspicious account connectivity patterns.
“For instance, several group detectors implement graph-based approaches and aim at spotting suspicious account connectivity patterns [20, 24].”
From A decade of social bot detection (2020) · cites this paper as [20]
The approach in [9] might lack reusability across other groups of spambots with different behaviors.
“However, although achieving an overall good performance for the considered spambots, the approach in [9] might lack reusability across other groups of spambots with different behaviors, such as those perpetrating a follower fraud [5],[11].”
From DNA-Inspired Online Behavioral Modeling and Its Application to Spambot Detection (2016) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 88
- Authors
- Jiang, M., Cui, P., Beutel, A., Faloutsos, C., & Yang, S.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data
- Published
- 2016-06-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 1556-4681 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-472X
- OpenAlex
- W2473813716
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 6.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61370022, 61210008, and 61303075)
- MDA, Singapore (WBS:R-252-300-001-490)
- Army Research Laboratory under Cooperative (W911NF-09-2-0053)
- U.S. Army Research Office (ARO) and Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-11-C-0088)
- Facebook Fellowship; and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1252522)
- International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China (2013DFG12870)
- National Program on Key Basic Research Project (2011CB302206)
- National Science Foundation (CNS-1314632 and IIS-1408924)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- graph anomaly detection, parameter-free algorithms, botnet detection, fake followers, Twitter, Weibo
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review