The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A survey of temporal web search experience
Abstract
Temporal aspects of web search have gained a great level of attention in the recent years. However, many of the research attempts either focused on technical development of various tools or behavioral analysis based on log data. This paper presents the results of user survey carried out to investigate the practice and experience of temporal web search. A total of 110 people was recruited and answered 18 questions regarding their recent experience of web search. Our results suggest that an interplay of seasonal interests, technicality of information needs, target time of information, re-finding behaviour, and freshness of information can be important factors for the application of temporal search. These findings should be complementary to log analyses for further development of temporally aware search engines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In their survey, nearly half of the 110 respondents stated that the information for which they search is related to the present (information on the same day); yet a significant fraction also searches for future-related or past-related information.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Joho et al. 2013
In the citing paper
“In their survey, nearly half of the 110 respondents stated that the information for which they search is related to the present (information on the same day); yet a significant fraction also searches for future-related or past-related information.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Joho et al. 2013
In the citing paper
“The task of supporting searches for future-related information is critical since a significant number of users are looking for content about future events [Joho et al. 2013].”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Joho et al. 2013
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- O. Alonso, R. Baeza-Yates, J. Strötgen, M. and Gertz. Temporal information retrieval: Challanges and opportunities. In TWAW 2011 Workshop, 2011.
- 10.1007/978-3-642-12275-0_5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1277741.1277831 · DOI
- 10.5555/2051115.2051169 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1145/1247715.1247720 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/1887759.1887796 · DOI
- A. Khodaei, and O. Alonso. Temporally-Aware Signals for Social Search. In TAIA 2012 Workshop, 2012.
- 10.1145/1935826.1935862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1571941.1572085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1357054.1357312 · DOI
- 10.5555/1793274.1793347 · DOI
- 10.1145/2009916.2010104 · DOI
- 10.1145/1277741.1277770 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Joho, H., Jatowt, A., & Roi, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
- Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Yahoo! Research, Barcelona, Spain
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-05-13
- Pages
- 1101-1108
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
