Cited by 141Expert finding and Q&A systemsComplex Network Analysis TechniquesKnowledge Management and Sharing

Analysis of the reputation system and user contributions on a question answering website: StackOverflow

Movshovitz-Attias, Dana, Movshovitz-Attias, Yair, Steenkiste, Peter, Faloutsos, Christos·2013·Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining

Abstract

Question answering (Q&A) communities have been gaining popularity in the past few years. The success of such sites depends mainly on the contribution of a small number of expert users who provide a significant portion of the helpful answers, and so identifying users that have the potential of becoming strong contributers is an important task for owners of such communities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2492517.2500242

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Movshovitz-Attias, D., Movshovitz-Attias, Y., Steenkiste, P., & Faloutsos, C.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-08-25
Pages
886-893
OpenAlex
W1981552292
Cited by
141
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3
FWCI
7.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Expert finding and Q&A systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
reputation systems, user contribution, expert users, user identification, online communities, Q&A platforms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review