The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overlapping community detection in networks: The state-of-the-art and comparative study
Open accessAbstract
This article reviews the state-of-the-art in overlapping community detection algorithms, quality measures, and benchmarks. A thorough comparison of different algorithms (a total of fourteen) is provided. In addition to community-level evaluation, we propose a framework for evaluating algorithms' ability to detect overlapping nodes, which helps to assess overdetection and underdetection. After considering community-level detection performance measured by normalized mutual information, the Omega index, and node-level detection performance measured by F-score, we reached the following conclusions. For low overlapping density networks, SLPA, OSLOM, Game, and COPRA offer better performance than the other tested algorithms. For networks with high overlapping density and high overlapping diversity, both SLPA and Game provide relatively stable performance. However, test results also suggest that the detection in such networks is still not yet fully resolved. A common feature observed by various algorithms in real-world networks is the relatively small fraction of overlapping nodes (typically less than 30%), each of which belongs to only 2 or 3 communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis
Langfelder, P., & Horvath, S. (2008) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 · Cited by 27,252
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1985) · Journal of Classification · doi:10.1007/bf01908075 · Cited by 8,219
Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society
Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03607 · Cited by 5,373
Ankerst, M. (1999) · doi:10.1145/304181.304187 · Cited by 3,982
Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks
Guimerà, R., Sales-Pardo, M., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2004) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.70.025101 · Cited by 894
Robustness of community structure in networks
Karrer, B., Levina, E., & Newman, M. E. J. (2008) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.77.046119 · Cited by 350
Cited by
Community detection in networks: a user guide
Fortunato, S., & Hric, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002 · Cited by 2,086
Challenges in unsupervised clustering of single-cell RNA-seq data
Kiselev, V. Y., Andrews, T. S., & Hemberg, M. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-018-0088-9 · Cited by 1,160
Social big data: recent achievements and new challenges
Bello-Orgaz, G., Jung, J. J., & Camacho, D. (2016) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005 · Cited by 846
“[58] reviewed the state of the art in overlapping comunity detection algorithms.”
BackgroundCommunity detection in networks: A multidisciplinary review
Javed, M. A., Younis, M. S., Latif, S., Qadir, J., & Baig, A. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.02.011 · Cited by 499
Community detection in social networks
Bedi, P., & Sharma, C. (2016) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1178 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Xie, J., Kelley, S., & Szymanski, B. K.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-35
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W4292081303
- Cited by
- 930
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 53.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overlapping community detection in networks: The state-of-the-art and comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2501654.2501657
- The paper
- Xie, J., Kelley, S., & Szymanski, B. K. (2013). Overlapping community detection in networks: The state-of-the-art and comparative study. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/2501654.2501657
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.