The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How fresh do you want your search results?
Abstract
Researchers have recognized the importance of utilizing temporal features for improving the performance of information retrieval systems. Specifically, the timeliness of a web document can be a significant factor for determining whether it is relevant for a search query. Previous works have proposed time-aware retrieval models with particular focus on news queries, where recent web documents related with a real-world event are generally preferable. These queries typically exhibit bursts in the volume of published documents or submitted queries. However, no work has studied the role of time in queries such as "credit card overdraft fees" that have no major spikes in either document or query volumes over time, yet they still favor more recently published documents. In this work, we focus on this class of queries that we refer to as "timely queries". We show that the change in the terms distribution of results of timely queries over time is strongly correlated with the users' perception of time sensitivity. Based on this observation, we propose a method to estimate the query timeliness requirements and we propose principled ways to incorporate document freshness into the ranking model. Our study shows that our method yields a more accurate estimation of timeliness compared to volume-based approaches. We experimentally compare our ranking strategy with other time-sensitive and non time-sensitive ranking algorithms and we show that it improves the results' retrieval quality for ti…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“[Cheng et al. 2013] presented a language ranking model that incorporates the timeliness factor to retrieve fresh recent results for non-spike timely queries.”
From Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications (2015) · cites this paper as Cheng et al. 2013
Citations
Cites
Learning to rank using gradient descent
Burges, C., Shaked, T., Renshaw, E., Lazier, A., Deeds, M., Hamilton, N., & Hullender, G. (2005) · Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '05 · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102363 · Cited by 2,836
Modeling and predicting behavioral dynamics on the web
Radinsky, K., Svore, K., Dumais, S., Teevan, J., Bocharov, A., & Horvitz, E. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187918 · Cited by 122
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.1145/956863.956951 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1247715.1247720 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2009916.2009984 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TKDE.2010.187 · DOI
- F. Diaz "Integration of news content into web results " in WSDM pp. 182--191 2009. 10.1145/1498759.1498825 · DOI
- 10.1145/1718487.1718490 · DOI
- 10.1145/1772690.1772725 · DOI
- 10.1145/1935826.1935862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2009916.2009933 · DOI
- 10.1145/2063576.2063862 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2414425.2414429 · DOI
- 10.1145/1571941.1572002 · DOI
- 10.1145/1718487.1718489 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aoms/1177729694 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/1763653.1763660 · DOI
- 10.1145/290941.291008 · DOI · Paper page
- J. Pérez-Iglesias, J. R. Pérez-Agüera, V. Fresno, and Y. Z. Feinstein, "Integrating the probabilistic models BM25/BM25F into Lucene," CoRR, vol. abs/0911.5046, 2009. · arXiv
- 10.1145/1645953.1645968 · DOI
- 10.1145/2009916.2010182 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-28997-2_40 · DOI
- 10.1145/1718487.1718542 · DOI
- 10.1145/290941.290956 · DOI
- 10.1145/1008992.1009030 · DOI
- 10.1145/1277741.1277907 · DOI
- 10.1145/582415.582418 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/1121636 · DOI
- I. Soboroff "A comparison of pooled and sampled relevance judgments " in SIGIR pp. 785--786 2007. 10.1145/1277741.1277908 · DOI
- 10.1137/S0895480102412856 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Survey of Temporal Information Retrieval and Related Applications
Campos, R., Dias, G., Jorge, A. M., & Jatowt, A. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2619088 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, S., Arvanitis, A., & Hristidis, V.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-10-27
- Pages
- 1271-1280
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review