Cited by 112Advanced Bandit Algorithms ResearchRecommender Systems and TechniquesInformation Retrieval and Search Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic ad format selection via contextual bandits

Tang, Liang, Rosales, Romer, Singh, Ajit, Agarwal, Deepak·2013·Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management

Abstract

Visual design plays an important role in online display advertising: changing the layout of an online ad can increase or decrease its effectiveness, measured in terms of click-through rate (CTR) or total revenue. The decision of which lay- out to use for an ad involves a trade-off: using a layout provides feedback about its effectiveness (exploration), but collecting that feedback requires sacrificing the immediate reward of using a layout we already know is effective (exploitation). To balance exploration with exploitation, we pose automatic layout selection as a contextual bandit problem. There are many bandit algorithms, each generating a policy which must be evaluated. It is impractical to test each policy on live traffic. However, we have found that offline replay (a.k.a. exploration scavenging) can be adapted to provide an accurate estimator for the performance of ad layout policies at Linkedin, using only historical data about the effectiveness of layouts. We describe the development of our offline replayer, and benchmark a number of common bandit algorithms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2505515.2514700

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A non-contextual multi-armed bandit model with layout identifiers has been applied previously to ad layout optimization.

    “Such a model has been applied previously to ad layout optimization [19].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. B. Edelman, M. Ostrovsky, and M. Schwarz. Internet advertising and the generalized second-price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. American Economic Review, 99(2):430--434, 2009.
  2. 10.5555/2898607.2898800 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Tang, L., Rosales, R., Singh, A., & Agarwal, D.
Affiliations
  • Florida International University (US)
  • LinkedIn (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management
Publisher
ACM
Published
2013-10-27
Pages
1587-1594
ISSN
2155-0751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092092836
Cited by
111
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 4
FWCI
13.52
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Keywords
contextual bandits, online display advertising, exploration-exploitation balance, click-through rate, advertising revenue, LinkedIn

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review