The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving efficiency and accuracy in multilingual entity extraction
Open accessAbstract
There has recently been an increased interest in named entity recognition and disambiguation systems at major conferences such as WWW, SIGIR, ACL, KDD, etc. However, most work has focused on algorithms and evaluations, leaving little space for implementation details. In this paper, we discuss some implementation and data processing challenges we encountered while developing a new multilingual version of DBpedia Spotlight that is faster, more accurate and easier to configure. We compare our solution to the previous system, considering time performance, space requirements and accuracy in the context of the Dutch and English languages. Additionally, we report results for 9 additional languages among the largest Wikipedias. Finally, we present challenges and experiences to foment the discussion with other developers interested in recognition and disambiguation of entities in natural language text.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Knowledge Graph Embedding: A Survey of Approaches and Applications
Wang, Q., Mao, Z., Wang, B., & Guo, L. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2017.2754499 · Cited by 2,654
Knowledge Enhanced Contextual Word Representations
Peters, M. E., Neumann, M., Logan, R., Schwartz, R., Joshi, V., Singh, S., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1005 · Cited by 661
MQTTset, a New Dataset for Machine Learning Techniques on MQTT
Vaccari, I., Chiola, G., Aiello, M., Mongelli, M., & Cambiaso, E. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20226578 · Cited by 292
REBEL: Relation Extraction By End-to-end Language generation
Huguet Cabot, P.-L., & Navigli, R. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.204 · Cited by 261
emrQA: A Large Corpus for Question Answering on Electronic Medical Records
Pampari, A., Raghavan, P., Liang, J., & Peng, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1258 · Cited by 191
Video Question Answering with Spatio-Temporal Reasoning
Jang, Y., Song, Y., Kim, C. D., Yu, Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, G. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01189-x · Cited by 46
Data-Driven Methodology for Knowledge Graph Generation Within the Tourism Domain
Chessa, A., Fenu, G., Motta, E., Osborne, F., Reforgiato Recupero, D., Salatino, A., & Secchi, L. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3292153 · Cited by 40
Bongir, A., Attar, V., & Janardhanan, R. (2018) · Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68385-0_15 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Daiber, J., Jakob, M., Hokamp, C., & Mendes, P. N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-09-04
- Pages
- 121-124
- OpenAlex
- W2026810221
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
