Cited by 304Innovative Human-Technology InteractionDigital Communication and LanguageMedia and Digital Communication

Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp

O'Hara, Kenton P., Massimi, Michael, Harper, Richard, Rubens, Simon, Morris, Jessica·2014·Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing

Abstract

In this paper, we present a study of WhatsApp, an instant messaging smartphone application. Through our interviews with participants, we develop anthopologist Tim Ingold's notion of dwelling, and discuss how use of WhatsApp is constitutive of a felt-life of being together with those close by. We focus on the relationship "doings" in WhatsApp and how this togetherness and intimacy are enacted through small, continuous traces of narrative, of tellings and tidbits, noticings and thoughts, shared images and lingering pauses; this is constitutive of dwelling. Further, we discuss how an intimate knowing of others in these relationships, through past encounters and knowledge of coming together in the future, pertain to the particular forms of relationship engagements manifest through the possibilities presented in WhatsApp. We suggest that this form of sociality is likely to be manifest in other smartphone IM-like applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2531602.2531679

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Facebook and WhatsApp could be used as a key component to understand how young people socialize through these applications.

    “Facebook and WhatsApp (as WhatsApp could be considered a social media) could be used as a key component to understand how young people socialize through these applications [57].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 304

Authors
O'Hara, K. P., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • new experience limited, London, United Kingdom
Venue
Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-02-15
Pages
1131-1143
OpenAlex
W2159144235
Cited by
304
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
18.25
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
WhatsApp, instant messaging, dwelling, Tim Ingold, intimacy, togetherness, sociality, mobile application, narrative, relationships, everyday life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review