Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 836

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings

Lyubashevsky, Vadim, Peikert, Chris, Regev, Oded·2013·Journal of the ACM

Abstract

The “learning with errors” (LWE) problem is to distinguish random linear equations, which have been perturbed by a small amount of noise, from truly uniform ones. The problem has been shown to be as hard as worst-case lattice problems, and in recent years it has served as the foundation for a plethora of cryptographic applications. Unfortunately, these applications are rather inefficient due to an inherent quadratic overhead in the use of LWE. A main open question was whether LWE and its applications could be made truly efficient by exploiting extra algebraic structure, as was done for lattice-based hash functions (and related primitives). We resolve this question in the affirmative by introducing an algebraic variant of LWE called ring-LWE , and proving that it too enjoys very strong hardness guarantees. Specifically, we show that the ring-LWE distribution is pseudorandom, assuming that worst-case problems on ideal lattices are hard for polynomial-time quantum algorithms. Applications include the first truly practical lattice-based public-key cryptosystem with an efficient security reduction; moreover, many of the other applications of LWE can be made much more efficient through the use of ring-LWE.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2535925

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.5555/1881412.1881420 · doi:10.5555/1881412.1881420
  2. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1946-08538-9 · doi:10.1090/s0002-9904-1946-08538-9
  3. Shafi Goldwasser , Yael Tauman Kalai , Chris Peikert , and Vinod Vaikuntanathan . 2010 . Robustness of the learning with errors assumption . In Proceedings of ICS. 230--240 . Shafi Goldwasser, Yael Tauman Kalai, Chris Peikert, and Vinod Vaikuntanathan. 2010. Robustness of the learning with errors assumption. In Proceedings of ICS. 230--240.
  4. 10.5555/1964621.1964651 · doi:10.5555/1964621.1964651
  5. 10.5555/1793774.1793789 · doi:10.5555/1793774.1793789
  6. 10.5555/1802614.1802619 · doi:10.5555/1802614.1802619
  7. 10.1145/1374376.1374406 · doi:10.1145/1374376.1374406
  8. Peter Roquette . 1967. On class field towers . In Algebraic Number Theory, John William Scott Cassels and Albrecht Fröhlich Eds., Academic Press , 231--249. Peter Roquette. 1967. On class field towers. In Algebraic Number Theory, John William Scott Cassels and Albrecht Fröhlich Eds., Academic Press, 231--249.
  9. 10.5555/2008684.2008690 · doi:10.5555/2008684.2008690

Cited by

See all 836

Metadata

Authors
Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., & Regev, O.
Venue
Journal of the ACM
Published
2013-11
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
1-35
ISSN
  • 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-735X
OpenAlex
W2071825329
Cited by
836
References
56
FWCI
50.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Integrated Project QAP
  • Sixth Framework Programme
  • IST directorate (15848)
  • Division of Computing and Communication Foundations (CCF-1054495)
  • Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-0716786)
  • Wolfson Foundation
  • European Research Council
  • United States - Israel Binational Science Foundation
  • Israel Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2535925
The paper
Lyubashevsky, V., Peikert, C., & Regev, O. (2013). On Ideal Lattices and Learning with Errors over Rings. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2535925

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.