Cited by 161Information Systems Theories and ImplementationElectronic Health Records SystemsERP Systems Implementation and Impact

Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach

Cho, Sunyoung, Mathiassen, Lars, Nilsson, Agneta·2008·European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

Despite its information-intensive nature and considerable investments, healthcare continues to lag behind other industries in effectively exploiting information technology (IT). This paradox suggests that the healthcare industry presents particular challenges for successful implementation of information systems. As a result, there is an increasing interest in research into how information systems implementation efforts are shaped in interaction with the healthcare context. This paper contributes to this emerging body of knowledge by applying Actor-Network Theory (ANT) to explore the implementation of a radiology network system in a Swedish hospital. The analysis of the process reveals how complex contextual dynamics had disruptive effects. First, we identified important dynamics related to implementation content; these were mainly expressed as tensions between the radiology network system and medical work practices. Second, we found important dynamics related to implementation context; these were mainly expressed as tensions between shifting networks of actors within the implementation project and the broader institutional setting. Seeking to understand contextual dynamics during healthcare information systems implementation, we use events to focus, structure, and present the ANT analysis. This event-based approach furthers our understanding of how researchers can apply ANT to study IT-based change in general.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/ejis.2008.49

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • National EHR endeavors should not be seen as programs composed of discrete ICT projects dissociated from policy, technology, service delivery and clinical work; rather, these elements are inextricable parts of EHR programs.

    “Thus we see national EHR endeavors not as programs composed of essentially discrete ICT ‘projects’, dissociated from policy, technology, service delivery and clinical work. Rather, we see the need to incorporate these elements in evaluation as inextricable parts of EHR programs, including the constantly changing parallel policies and strategies, complex and evolving software ecologies and diverse”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cho, S., Mathiassen, L., & Nilsson, A.
Affiliations
  • Virginia State University (US)
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Cho, Sunyoung
Venue
European Journal of Information Systems
Published
2008-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
614-630
ISSN
  • 0960-085X (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9344
OpenAlex
W1973058570
Cited by
161
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 21
FWCI
33.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
Keywords
health information system implementation, actor-network theory, event-based analysis, contextual dynamics, institutional environment, hospital information technology, disruptive effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review