Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Achieving accuracy and scalability simultaneously in detecting application clones on Android markets

Chen, Kai, Liu, Peng, Zhang, Yingjun·2014·Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering
DOI 10.1145/2568225.2568286
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Besides traditional problems such as potential bugs, (smartphone) application clones on Android markets bring new threats. That is, attackers clone the code from legitimate Android applications, assemble it with malicious code or advertisements, and publish these ``purpose-added" app clones on the same or other markets for benefits. Three inherent and unique characteristics make app clones difficult to detect by existing techniques: a billion opcode problem caused by cross-market publishing, gap between code clones and app clones, and prevalent Type 2 and Type 3 clones.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2568225.2568286

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. B. Baker . A program for identifying duplicated code . Computing Science and Statistics , pages 49– 49 , 1993 . B. Baker. A program for identifying duplicated code. Computing Science and Statistics, pages 49–49, 1993.
  2. B. S. Baker . On finding duplication and near-duplication in large software systems . In Reverse Engineering , 1995 ., pages 86– 95 . IEEE, 1995. B. S. Baker. On finding duplication and near-duplication in large software systems. In Reverse Engineering, 1995., pages 86–95. IEEE, 1995.
  3. I. Baxter , A. Yahin , L. Moura , M. Sant’Anna , and L. Bier . Clone detection using abstract syntax trees. In icsm , pages 368– 377 , 1998 . I. Baxter, A. Yahin, L. Moura, M. Sant’Anna, and L. Bier. Clone detection using abstract syntax trees. In icsm, pages 368–377, 1998.
  4. I. D. Baxter , C. Pidgeon , and M. Mehlich . Dms R : Program transformations for practical scalable software evolution . In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering , pages 625– 634 . IEEE Computer Society, 2004. I. D. Baxter, C. Pidgeon, and M. Mehlich. Dms R : Program transformations for practical scalable software evolution. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 625–634. IEEE Computer Society, 2004.
  5. J. Crussell , C. Gibler , and H. Chen . Attack of the clones: Detecting cloned applications on android markets. Computer Security–ESORICS 2012 , pages 37– 54 , 2012. J. Crussell, C. Gibler, and H. Chen. Attack of the clones: Detecting cloned applications on android markets. Computer Security–ESORICS 2012, pages 37–54, 2012.
  6. 10.1007/978-3-642-40203-6_11 · DOI
  7. Dangle. Dangle. http://android.d.cn , 2013 . Dangle. Dangle. http://android.d.cn, 2013.
  8. 10.1145/24039.24041 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1145/1368088.1368132 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1145/1932682.1869475 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/2462456.2464461 · DOI
  12. Google. Google play. https://play.google.com/store , 2013 . Google. Google play. https://play.google.com/store, 2013.
  13. 10.1007/978-3-642-37300-8_4 · DOI
  14. 10.1145/322033.322044 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1145/1985793.1985899 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1109/ICSE.2007.30 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070547 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1109/TSE.2002.1019480 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1145/1985793.1985835 · DOI
  20. 10.1007/11424925_2 · DOI
  21. 10.5555/647170.718283 · doi:10.5555/647170.718283
  22. 10.1145/1882291.1882317 · doi:10.1145/1882291.1882317
  23. J. Li and M. D. Ernst . Cbcd: Cloned buggy code detector . In Software Engineering (ICSE), 2012 34th International Conference on , pages 310– 320 . IEEE, 2012. J. Li and M. D. Ernst. Cbcd: Cloned buggy code detector. In Software Engineering (ICSE), 2012 34th International Conference on, pages 310–320. IEEE, 2012.
  24. Z. Li , S. Lu , S. Myagmar , and Y. Zhou . Cp-miner: A tool for finding copy-paste and related bugs in operating system code . In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Symposium on Opearting Systems Design & Implementation , volume 6 , pages 20–– 20 , 2004 . Z. Li, S. Lu, S. Myagmar, and Y. Zhou. Cp-miner: A tool for finding copy-paste and related bugs in operating system code. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Symposium on Opearting Systems Design & Implementation, volume 6, pages 20––20, 2004.
  25. 10.1109/TSE.2006.28 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.infsof.2009.04.011 · DOI
  27. C. McMillan , M. Grechanik , and D. Poshyvanyk . Detecting similar software applications . In Software Engineering (ICSE), 2012 34th International Conference on , pages 364– 374 . IEEE, 2012. C. McMillan, M. Grechanik, and D. Poshyvanyk. Detecting similar software applications. In Software Engineering (ICSE), 2012 34th International Conference on, pages 364–374. IEEE, 2012.
  28. G. Myles and C. Collberg . Detecting software theft via whole program path birthmarks. Information security , pages 404– 415 , 2004 . G. Myles and C. Collberg. Detecting software theft via whole program path birthmarks. Information security, pages 404–415, 2004.
  29. 10.1145/1066677.1066753 · DOI
  30. 10.1145/2393596.2393600 · doi:10.1145/2393596.2393600
  31. 10.1145/1858996.1859089 · DOI
  32. C. Roy and J. Cordy . A survey on software clone detection research. Technical report , Queen’s School of Computing TR , 2007 . C. Roy and J. Cordy. A survey on software clone detection research. Technical report, Queen’s School of Computing TR, 2007.
  33. 10.1145/1321631.1321672 · DOI
  34. H. Tamada , M. Nakamura , A. Monden , and K.-i. Matsumoto . Design and evaluation of birthmarks for detecting theft of java programs . In Proc. IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering (IASTED SE 2004 ), pages 569– 575 , 2004 . H. Tamada, M. Nakamura, A. Monden, and K.-i. Matsumoto. Design and evaluation of birthmarks for detecting theft of java programs. In Proc. IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering (IASTED SE 2004), pages 569–575, 2004.
  35. H. Tamada , K. Okamoto , M. Nakamura , A. Monden , and K.-i. Matsumoto . Dynamic software birthmarks to detect the theft of windows applications . In International Symposium on Future Software Technology , volume 2004 , 2004 . H. Tamada, K. Okamoto, M. Nakamura, A. Monden, and K.-i. Matsumoto. Dynamic software birthmarks to detect the theft of windows applications. In International Symposium on Future Software Technology, volume 2004, 2004.
  36. N. Truong , P. Roe , and P. Bancroft . Static analysis of students’ java programs . In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education-Volume 30 , pages 317– 325 . Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2004. N. Truong, P. Roe, and P. Bancroft. Static analysis of students’ java programs. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education-Volume 30, pages 317–325. Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2004.
  37. 10.1145/1653662.1653696 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/spe.4380210706 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1145/2338965.2336767 · DOI
  40. 10.1145/2435349.2435377 · DOI
  41. 10.1145/2133601.2133640 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1109/SP.2012.16 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Chen, K., Liu, P., & Zhang, Y.
Venue
Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-05-31
Pages
175-186
ISSN
0270-5257 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1145/2568225.2568286
OpenAlex
W2088479623
Cited by
287
References
2
FWCI
29.65
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.