Cited by 42Digital Storytelling and EducationEducation and Technology IntegrationMobile Learning in Education

Fiabot!: design and evaluation of a mobile storytelling application for schools

Rubegni, Elisa, Landoni, Monica·2014·Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children

Abstract

This paper contributes to the ongoing debate about how digital technology can be integrated into the formal education system. Within a longitudinal research study, which lasted four years, we conducted an investigation on how mobile technology can support educational activities as defined by a school curriculum. Among the topics included in the school curriculum, we focused on the literary field and developed a Digital StoryTelling (DST) application, Fiabot!, to support this activity. Here, we describe the design of the application and how we evaluated its impact on educational activities. The application was designed and evaluated in two primary schools. The study had the objectives of exploring whether Fiabot! supports children in achieving educational objectives defined by the curriculum, how this effectively supports teachers, and to what extent children like using it for the creation and sharing of their stories. Our findings show that the application has a positive impact on curriculum enactment and effectively supports the related educational activities. Overall, Fiabot! wasdemonstrated to be very effective in stimulating children's discussion of a story's plot and characters. Thus, Fiabot! supported children not only in being creative but also in organizing their work and exploring a digital media opportunity. This resulted in the development of new skills and the better grounding of previously acquired knowledge, while teachers also had the opportunity to expand their teaching skills and get a taste of ICT's potential in education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2593968.2593979

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 42

Authors
Rubegni, E., & Landoni, M.
Affiliations
Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-06-17
Pages
165-174
OpenAlex
W2080778965
Cited by
42
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
13.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) (publishedVersion)
  • Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Digital Storytelling and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
digital storytelling, mobile learning, primary education, curriculum enactment, children's literature, story creation, ICT in education, teacher support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review