Fiabot!: design and evaluation of a mobile storytelling application for schools
Abstract
This paper contributes to the ongoing debate about how digital technology can be integrated into the formal education system. Within a longitudinal research study, which lasted four years, we conducted an investigation on how mobile technology can support educational activities as defined by a school curriculum. Among the topics included in the school curriculum, we focused on the literary field and developed a Digital StoryTelling (DST) application, Fiabot!, to support this activity. Here, we describe the design of the application and how we evaluated its impact on educational activities. The application was designed and evaluated in two primary schools. The study had the objectives of exploring whether Fiabot! supports children in achieving educational objectives defined by the curriculum, how this effectively supports teachers, and to what extent children like using it for the creation and sharing of their stories. Our findings show that the application has a positive impact on curriculum enactment and effectively supports the related educational activities. Overall, Fiabot! wasdemonstrated to be very effective in stimulating children's discussion of a story's plot and characters. Thus, Fiabot! supported children not only in being creative but also in organizing their work and exploring a digital media opportunity. This resulted in the development of new skills and the better grounding of previously acquired knowledge, while teachers also had the opportunity to expand their teaching skills and get a taste of ICT's potential in education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Family communication can be hindered or disrupted by excessive technology use, parental work-family conflict, and undesirable communication patterns.
“However, family communications can be hindered or disrupted by many issues, such as excessive technology use [19], parental work-family conflict [77], and undesirable communication patterns [94].”
From "When He Feels Cold, He Goes to the Seahorse"—Blending Generative AI into Multimaterial Storymaking for Family Expressive Arts Therapy (2024) · cites this paper as [94]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 42
- Authors
- Rubegni, E., & Landoni, M.
- Affiliations
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-06-17
- Pages
- 165-174
- OpenAlex
- W2080778965
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 13.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln Repository (University of Lincoln) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Digital Storytelling and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
- Keywords
- digital storytelling, mobile learning, primary education, curriculum enactment, children's literature, story creation, ICT in education, teacher support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review