The DOI matches its Crossref record.
OpenState: programming platform-independent stateful openflow applications inside the switch
Abstract
Software Defined Networking envisions smart centralized controllers governing the forwarding behavior of dumb low-cost switches. But are "dumb" switches an actual strategic choice, or (at least to some extent) are they a consequence of the lack of viable alternatives to OpenFlow as programmatic data plane forwarding interface? Indeed, some level of (programmable) control logic in the switches might be beneficial to offload logically centralized controllers (de facto complex distributed systems) from decisions just based on local states (versus network-wide knowledge), which could be handled at wire speed inside the device itself. Also, it would reduce the amount of flow processing tasks currently delegated to specialized middleboxes. The underlying challenge is: can we devise a stateful data plane programming abstraction (versus the stateless OpenFlow match/action table) which still entails high performance and remains consistent with the vendors' preference for closed platforms? We posit that a promising answer revolves around the usage of extended finite state machines, as an extension (super-set) of the OpenFlow match/action abstraction. We concretely turn our proposed abstraction into an actual table-based API, and, perhaps surprisingly, we show how it can be supported by (mostly) reusing core primitives already implemented in OpenFlow devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700
Distributed SDN Control: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
Bannour, F., Souihi, S., & Mellouk, A. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2782482 · Cited by 452
Galluccio, L., Milardo, S., Morabito, G., & Palazzo, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom.2015.7218418 · Cited by 364
NFV and SDN—Key Technology Enablers for 5G Networks
Yousaf, F. Z., Bredel, M., Schaller, S., & Schneider, F. (2017) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2017.2760418 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Bianchi, G., Bonola, M., Capone, A., & Cascone, C.
- Venue
- ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
- Published
- 2014-04-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 44-51
- ISSN
- 0146-4833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062596448
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OpenState: programming platform-independent stateful openflow applications inside the switch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2602204.2602211
- The paper
- Bianchi, G., Bonola, M., Capone, A., & Cascone, C. (2014). OpenState: programming platform-independent stateful openflow applications inside the switch. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602204.2602211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.